Injuries happen in all sports – especially football.
It would be awesome if we could develop a way to completely solve the problem, but we never will. Football is a violent sport, and when you have guys as big and as fast as NFL athletes, injuries will invariably follow.
However, every year, injuries DO occur that could be avoided – especially when guys like James Harrison are involved.
Image source: LATimes.com
Treat James Harrison (And Others) Like How They Act
Full disclosure: I don’t like James Harrison much because I don’t respect some of the things he does on the field and some of the comments he makes off of it. It takes more strength to avoid a fight than to start one. It takes much more self-control to hold your tongue when you dislike someone than to mouth off.
James Harrison often acts like a child, repeatedly. So to deter him and change his behavior, perhaps it is time that he – and others like him – be treated like one.
Children have to be told over and over again not to do the same thing. Children have to be disciplined when they keep breaking rules. Children have to be punished more and more severely until they finally wake up.
So then, for cases like Harrison, what is the best solution?
When players like Harrison, or Ndamukong Suh, or others KEEP breaking rules and KEEP injuring players and choose to just KEEP paying the same fines and serving the suspensions…then the disciplinary system is NOT working.
Here is a creative, drastic solution, the “James Harrison Rule” if you will, that could finally have the impact the NFL so clearly desires.
A Creative, Drastic Solution To A Pervasive Problem
The next time a player injures an opponent by BLATANTLY breaking a black and white rule…he must not only pay the fine, but also sit out until the injured player can return.
When Todd Bertuzzi took out Steve Moore from behind, he was suspended for two years. But that wasn’t good enough.
Bertuzzi broke the rules of manhood and hockey – you don’t blind-side someone from behind. He broke the laws of this country – that would have been an assault in real life.
Most importantly, Steve Moore NEVER PLAYED AGAIN. Todd Bertuzzi shouldn’t have played again either.
If a player knew that he would have sit out until his opponent was healthy, how many players would KEEP breaking the rules in order to try and injure an opponent?
James Harrison got it easy.
He got to skip a week, take some time off, and come back fresh. Nobody, especially veterans that have been around as long as Harrison, wants to play Monday Night and then again on Saturday, which the Steelers do next week.
Sure, his team lost, but they are still in the playoffs. In fact, they will probably get to go to Denver on opening weekend – the Steelers aren’t worried about that at all.
But Colt McCoy is still out.
Just think about that.
The guy that played by the rules is out for LONGER than the guy that broke them.
The guy that played fair is suffering a greater punishment than the guy that cheated.
Let’s not forget that Harrison got to finish out that game – completely healthy. McCoy sleepwalked his way through the rest of that game, and may miss the last three games of the season.
Image credit: Don Wright/Associated Press via Washington Post
At this point, it doesn’t matter how much I dislike James Harrison – that’s just not fair.
Drastic Times Call For Drastic Measures
Harrison should be out until Colt McCoy returns. If that’s not until next season and Harrison has to miss the playoffs…so be it.
You might think this is drastic…probably because it’s so different. Nobody has ever thought about implementing a rule like this before.
And obviously there would need to be some checks and balances on it.
First off, I think you would definitely need to have a committee of players AND referees to decide whether or not given plays were illegal or not. Secondly, you would have to make sure that the Browns weren’t sitting McCoy on purpose, just to hurt the Steelers (even though I see a great amount of equality and irony in that idea…that’s not the purpose of this rule).
But just think about these three questions:
- Is the current system working?
- Would this new rule be UNFAIR?
- Would this new rule be a better deterrent than what’s in place?
In my mind, the answers to the first two questions are resounding “Nos!”
As to the third, would this be a better deterrent? I think so.
Regardless, sometimes you have to try new and creative punishments. If you don’t, the children of this world will keep acting like children.