‘Homeless Radio Voice Guy’ story shows us the best and worst of journalism in the Age of the Internet

ted-williams-ex-wife-patricia-kirtley

[Editor's note: Please make sure you read all the way through the update at the bottom of the post, which I added after being contacted by one of the subjects of this article.]

———-

If you have so much as checked your email this week, you undoubtedly are familiar with story of Ted Williams – the homeless panhandler from Columbus, Ohio with the golden radio voice.

The quick summary for the four of you unfamiliar with the story: a reporter posted a video on YouTube that showcased Williams’ plight and his golden pipes; the video then got tweeted at a furious pace as well as posted on blog after blog after blog (including this one); Williams then appeared on an Ohio radio station and then soon thereafter got job offers from the Cleveland Cavaliers, the NFL, and many others; then he ended up on the Today Show, where his instant fame reached a critical mass, all in a span of about 48 hours.

The story of Williams is both heartwarming and tragic at the same time. Almost everyone’s first instinct was to feel overjoyed that this man who had fallen on such hard times was being given a second chance to leverage his amazing talent and begin life anew in his mid-50s. At the same time, I also noticed many people expressing the same fear I had: that if a strong support system did not immediately build around Williams to help him deal with his newfound fame and future income, there was a better than decent chance that the demons he once bowed down to could once again claim his allegiance.

In the story of Ted Williams, the chapter entitled The Homeless Man with the Golden Radio Voice is now completed. We have now progressed into The Famous, Employed Man with the Golden Radio Voice, and many of us remain interested in seeing where this story goes, rooting as we always do for the underdog, for the triumph of the human spirit, and for happiness and salvation to win out over tragedy in the end. We’ll see.

In the meantime, it has occurred to me today that one of the more intriguing angles of the Williams story is how the story is being covered. Some of you may not find much relevance in the story-about-the-story-being-the-story, but for a blogger like me who once upon a time clung hopefully to vivid dreams of one day being a journalist, I find it to be a rather fascinating angle to analyze. And it just so happens that two different angles related to this story came across my computer screen today that perfectly encapsulate the best and the worst of contemporary journalism in the viral Age of the Internet..

[Read more...]

The Anchor’s Desk: The More Legitimate Blogs Become, the More Responsibility They Need to Assume

Bloggers v Mainstream Media - Accountability, ResponsibilityA Web log, also known as a blog, can be written by anyone. You can blog about your feelings, your cat, or whether you think it’s fair to suspect Raul Ibanez of using steroids, which is what JRod famously did last week.

Blogs have taken off, and now we’ve got a problem. The lines have blurred.

What happens when bloggers get together and create a site like Midwest Sports Fans, updating it with news, and making it look and feel like a news site? Are they now journalists with the same standards?

With mainstream media being consumed on the web more and more each day, it’s tougher to discern what’s journalism and what’s “just some guy writing.”

If you go on a newspapers’ website to get the news, it looks like a website, has a banner on top, and some columns and news items. If you go to a blog site, like Midwest Sports Fans, it may look pretty darn similar, with the basic web design, sponsor links, and columns. The difference is that the columns on this site don’t have the same journalistic standards.

This has become a pretty slippery slope.

As sites like Midwest Sports Fans explode in popularity, they become more legitimate-looking. Therefore, such sites’ readers treat then more as “news” as opposed to “wanderings of the mind.” Does this mean higher ethics and journalistic standards need to be exercised?

In the case of Raul Ibanez I think it does.

When you have Raul Ibanez reacting to it, and Jerod Morris (JRod) appearing on ESPN, you know your site has arrived. There is a responsibility to balance your right to blog with journalistic principles of fairness.

Here’s an analogy: If you tell a group of four friends that you suspect Mr. Smith is gay (and why), you’d feel okay, because you’re just telling a few people. But would you stand in a crowded opera house of 1,000 people and announce that with a megaphone? Probably not. You’d have to feel a little funny about that.

That’s the difference between writing something in a chat room or e-mail, versus placing it on a huge blog site like MWSF.

When talking about journalistic standards, the lines are blurry of course. Newspaper writers who blog for their own papers’ websites have let their standards slip. A decade ago, you would never print rumors or hunches unless you could confirm them. Nowadays, for some reason, the same legitimate journalists will post just about everything, thinking its okay because it’s “just on their blog.”

They put something on the web and then say…“but I haven’t been able to confirm it.” Then can you really say it at all?

However, I still know they would not go as far as to drag a stand-up guy like Ibanez into the steroid discussion, out of the blue. I’m a journalist, and I wouldn’t have. Mainstream media members have their reputations and relationships to maintain.

The subject of who has to stick to journalistic ethics and standards boils down to how you present yourself. If Jerod wondered about Ibanez’s possible steroid use in a chat room, it wouldn’t matter. But since MWSF has a huge following, Jerod (JRod) has turned himself into a quasi-journalist and needs to be careful. He told me on Friday that he doesn’t regret writing about his Ibanez-steroid theory (and naming him), he only regrets he wasn’t more careful with the tone and the title of the story. In other words, bloggers should have the right to say what’s on their mind, but he does sense that there is a level of responsibility that comes with it.

Remember bloggers, you’re not just talking to your friends anymore. You’re sharing this stuff with 50,000 people or more, larger than some newspapers’ entire circulation.

Jerod wrote a piece, basically saying it’s sad that in this day and age we have to suspect aging sluggers of steroid use. He speculated that Ibanez could very well be using.

If a member of the mainstream media wrote that piece, the author would not be ethically able to name Ibanez as an example, unless he was getting Ibanez’s reaction on the topic of “the blanket of suspicion.” There was an SI article on the same topic, using Albert Pujols as the focus. The reason that article was okay was that Pujols was discussing how sad it is that there are doubts. Plus the article wasn’t done in a way to ignite speculation.

JRod said he would have asked Ibanez about the topic, but bloggers don’t have the same access to the Bloggers v Mainstream Media - Accountability, Responsibilityplayers as regular media. I believe that makes it not okay to name names.

When JRod was on Outside the Lines (picture courtesy of Awful Announcing), Ken Rosenthal blasted him for not showing any decency and writing whatever he wanted. John Gonzalez of the Philly Inquirer took more of a middle ground, saying bloggers are the “wild west of journalism,” and they have to be careful. I agree with John to a point. People can blog about whatever, but when blog sites start to look like news organizations, there have to be some standards.

JRod did not come out and say Ibanez is using…he just said there is reason to doubt him in this day and age. That doesn’t sound terrible, but because JRod’s following is so huge, it certainly created a huge backlash, including from Ibanez himself.

MWSF has the burden of popularity. It has become legitimate. It has become a place people come to for insight and information. It is very easy for someone who is reading online material to forget they are on a blog site as opposed to mainstream media website.

At the end of the day, it’s up to each blogger to realize they have a level of responsibility to fact-check and not spread rumor. JRod found out the hard way that your tone and the way you present facts can do a lot of damage. While he says he doesn’t regret naming Ibanez, he says it has made him think about being careful. I also credit Jrod for reaching out to Ibanez after the story broke in Philadelphia and trying to explain himself.

That’s the type of responsibility, accountability, and decency that needs to be on everyone’s mind next time they blog.

———-

Scott Reister is a featured contributor to Midwest Sports Fans, as well as Dallas Sports Fans.

He is a Sports Anchor for the NBC affiliate in the Tri-Cities and Spokane, WA. To learn more about Scott, visit the Scott Reister bio page on Midwest Sports Fans or check out the Local Sports page on KNDU.com.

To contact Scott: sreister@hotmail.com

FOXSports.com Headlines Subliminally Communicate Hatred of ESPN

Jamal Anderson Snorts Cocaine of Toilet Seat, ArrestedThis weekend, former Atlanta Falcons running back Jamal Anderson was arrested and sent to jail for cocaine possession and misdemeanor marijuana possession.

As usual, this story of athletes and drugs is accompanied by salacious, yet entertaining, details (from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, as spotted by Deadspin):

“The patron had heard what he thought was sniffing from inside the stall and told the off-duty officer,” police spokesman Otis Redmond said, according to the newspaper. “The officer went into the restroom, heard the same sniffing and peered over the stall door. He saw Jamal Anderson and Mark Hudson sniffing two lines of powdered cocaine off the back of the toilet.” Hudson, 20, was also arrested at the bar in the Buckhead area of Atlanta, the report said.

Per FOXSports, Anderson was released from jail on $6,000 bond Sunday evening.

Numerous blogs have already dissected this story, so I have nothing new to add to the specifics and no clever jokes to tell. However, the subtle difference in the coverage of the story from two sports media titans did catch my eye.

As you may or may not know, depending on how attentive you are to weekday sports coverage during the morning and midday hours at ESPN, Jamal Anderson was an NFL analyst on ESPN’s First Take this past football season. Something tells me though that if you polled 100 people on the first thing that comes to their mind when they think of Jamal Anderson, “ESPN analyst” would not be at the top of the list. Thoughts like “Ex-Falcons RB”, “former All-Pro”, “dirty bird”, and “horrible knee injury season after carrying the ball 8,000 times” would likely be much more prevalent.

According to FOXSports, however, Anderson’s one-year stint with ESPN is now the defining description of his career. As evidence, I present a screen capture from the FOXSports.com front page:

Jamal Anderson Snorts Cocaine off a Toilet Seat - FOXSports headline

As you can see, FOXSports.com has decided that in the 60 or so characters they have to entice you to read an article, Anderson’s affiliation with ESPN warrants mention in the same line as “felony drug charge”. The headline of the actual article reads “Ex-Falcons RB, ESPN analyst Anderson out of jail”. It seems curious that FOXSports would choose the ESPN analyst angle for the front page headline.

Thinking that maybe I underestimated the association that sports fans in general made between Jamal Anderson and his brief tenure at ESPN, I poked around to other sites like SI.com and noticed that the headlines read similarly to the one on ESPN.com, which more intuitively describes Anderson as “ex-Falcons RB”:

Jamal Anderson Snorts Cocaine off Toilet Seat - ESPN Headline

So, what does this all mean?

I think it is subtle, yet pretty obvious, proof of FOXSports’ disdain for ESPN, or at least of the cutthroat competition between the two media giants.

There is really only one reason for FOXSports to use “ESPN Analyst” in the short headline about the Jamal Anderson story, which is to provide a slap in the face to its primary competition in the world of sports news. We all know that ESPN is the “Worldwide Leader in Sports” (at least according to ESPN anyway), and FOXSports ostensibly would like for you to know that they are also the “Worldwide Leader in Employing Analysts Who Snort Cocaine off Toilet Seats”.

And this, of course, is not the first time that the editorial staff and writers at FOXSports.com have thrown ESPN under the bus. Consider this Jason Whitlock column, for example. While Whitlock does laud The Sports Guy Bill Simmons (who himself has had consistent issues with ESPN, making this not really any kind of compliment towards ESPN), he packs a lot of venom for ESPN into the rest of his article:

  • In reference to ESPN bringing in Rick Reilly for $3 million: “By the time ESPN made it rain on Reilly he was more qualified to work the door at Spearmint Rhino than make more money at the Worldwide Leader than Simmons, Wilbon, Van Pelt and countless others.”
  • Whitlock explains why ESPN is underutilizing Andre Ware and Chris Spielman as college football analysts.
  • In reference to Dan Patrick and Keith Olbermann reprising their combo from the early ESPN days on Football Night in America: “I get the jokes and I have no problem with anyone publicly giving ESPN the finger.”
  • He blasts ESPN sideline reporter Erin Andrews.
  • In reference to sports blogs and the mainstream media policing itself: “It’s the same pattern that turned ESPN evil. Everyone decided working for ESPN or getting their scoop scrolled across the bottom of ESPN was more important than actually policing the most powerful institution in sports.”

And that is just in one article by one writer.

The moral of the story? First off, of course, if you are a former NFL running back with a nice gig at ESPN, it’s probably not a good idea to snort cocaine off any toilet seats that are not in your house. And secondly, if you are an ESPN sycophant, you probably should not go to FOXSports.com for second opinions on your sports news.

No, just wait for ESPN to report stories after “confirming on its own” a report undoubtedly broken by FOX.

Jamal Anderson’s unfortunate cocaine-toilet seat indiscretions gave FOXSports a perfect opportunity to subtlely insert the knife into ESPN and twist. Your abject hatred of the WWL is duly noted FOXSports. Mission accomplished.