Michigan State to Represent Big Ten in Final Four After Dominating Louisville

Note: This post is from 2009. To view our 2010 March Madness coverage, use the following links:

——————–

Michigan State Beats Louisville - Going to Final Four | Final 4 TicketsFull disclosure: I am starting this post with 3:00 left in the Michigan State-Louisville game. The Spartans are currently up 64-47 and have completely beaten Louisville into submission. I have been shocked by how little heart and grit Louisville has shown. Obviously, Michigan State’s heart and grit come as no surprise and are a reflection of their outstanding coach Tom Izzo.

Not that it took any kind of special prognosticating power, but the keys that I outlined a couple of days ago absolutely ended up being the keys to victory for Michigan State. They did a great job making 3s and defending the 3, they contained Terrence Williams and Earl Clark, they did a great job on the glass, and they made free throws.

This was, for all intents and purposes, a perfect game played Michigan State. And it resulted in a double-digit victory.

Congratulations to Tom Izzo and the Spartans for playing their best game of the season in the biggest spot so far. Now they head to Detroit to take on Connecticut in the Final Four. The Spartans will once again be prohibitive underdogs, and once again will have the challenge of proving the “experts” wrong. I’m glad I stuck with my gut feeling and maintained confidence in Michigan State. They certainly maintained confidence in themselves and the city of Detroit will now get to enjoy watching the home state team in the Final Four.

Click Here for Final Four Tickets in Detroit From StubHub

Here is the box score: Michigan State Beats Louisville 64-52

Photo Gallery: Michigan State-Louisville photos from ESPN.com

Schedule: Final Four Info and Tickets

LOTD Video: Scottie Reynolds Shot Beats Pitt, Villanova to Final Four

Video: Scottie Reynolds Buzzer Beater, Last Second Shot Beats PittWhat a freaking game.

I was anticipating Pitt-Villanova to be highly entertaining, closely contested game that came down to the wire, and it was even better than I expected. It was also perhaps my most shining moment as a Sweet 16/Elite 8 prognosticator, as Villanova’s close victory was exactly what I predicted.

And the MMP (Most Memorable Play) of the Villanova victory over Pitt came courtesy of Villanova’s superb guard Scottie Reynolds. The video is below, courtesy of Robert Littal at Black Sports Online:


Video: Scottie Reynolds Last Second Buzzer Beater Leads Villanova to Victory Over Pitt

LOTD: Villanova’s Scottie Reynolds Destroying Many Office Brackets With the Buzzer Beater — (Black Sports Online)

I was unable to actually watch this play live, which is why I hopped online to find video of the Scottie Reynolds buzzer beater as quickly as I could. I was out late last night at a sublime authentic German restaurant for my girlfriend’s grandfather’s 92nd birthday. One of the attendees had the March Madness app on his iphone, and we were able to watch up until about 0:30 left, when the signal went out. We finished listening on the radio, first as Levance Fields made his clutch free throws, and then as Scotte Reynolds dashed the Panthers’ dream with his incredible drive to the basket.

Reynolds actually did not have one of his best games statistically in Villanova’s Elite 8 victory over Pitt. He finished with 15 points and shot 7-7 from the line, but only had 2 rebounds and 1 assist. DwaVideo: Pitt Loses on Buzzer-Beater by Scottie Reynoldsyne Anderson stepped up huge and was the statistical MVP for Villanova. He scored 17 points, grabbed 6 rebounds, and had four steals.

And lost in the excitement over Scottie Reynolds’ buzzer beater was the superb play of Pitt’s trio of Levance Fields, Sam Young, and DeJuan Blair. Pitt is going home, but it certainly is not the fault of any of these three guys. Levance Fields made the clutch free throws as mentioned, and also dished out 6 assists against 0 turnovers. DeJuan Blair had another double-double, going for 20-10. And Sam Young was outstanding, scoring 28 points, snaring 7 rebounds, and dominating inside and outside.

Simply put, it was a great game played between two of the five best teams in America.

Unfortunately for Pitt, Villanova just appears to be one of those teams that has caught lightning in a bottle this March, as evidenced by the last second dash of Scottie Reynolds. Villanova is on an absolute roll, having beaten UCLA, Duke, and Pitt in three straight games. That is a pretty impressive list of victims.

Today, they will find out who they play next: North Carolina or Oklahoma. Villanova will be lower seed regardless, but it is going to be very hard to pick against them.

Elite 8: Louisville-Michigan State Preview, Analysis, and Prediction

goran-suton-michigan-state-uconn-preview

This post will analyze the Louisville-Michigan State Elite 8 game using a statistical analysis provided by the Game Predictor at ESPN.com, which is powered by TeamRankings.com. For an analysis of how this program works, hop over to the first individual game Sweet 16 preview I put out for UConn-Purdue. The methodology is all explained there.

Fans in Indianapolis were treated to one outstanding game yesterday and one complete massacre. The victors of those two games, Louisville and Michigan State, will take the court Sunday afternoon for the right to advance to the Final Four as the Midwest Regional Champion.

A quick look back before we look forward to the Midwest Regional Final on Sunday:

Michigan State and Kansas duked it out until the final seconds Friday night before the Spartans emerged victorious. Sherron Collins was fantastic, as expected, but Goran Suton Goran Suton | Louisville-MSU Preview and Prediction - Elite 8saved one of the best games of his career for a time when Michigan State really needed it. Suton scored 20 points and grabbed 9 rebounds in a tremendously clutch performance. I was right in my prediction that Michigan State would win, but wrong that they needed Raymar Morgan to have a big game. What they needed was someone to cancel out Cole Aldrich and Suton completed the task. You knew Kalin Lucas could battle Sherron Collins to a draw, which he did, and Michigan State has more experience throughout the balance of their roster than KU. In the end, that’s why they won.

And there isn’t really much to say about Louisville’s 103-64 win over Arizona. I predicted a Louisville win and cover, but I did not expect this complete a dismantling of the Wildcats. The Cardinals owned the game from the tip and never relinquished control. Five players scored in double figures, paced by Earl Clark’s 19 points to go along with 9 rebounds. The Cardinals shot 57.6% from the field, 48.3% from downtown (14-29), and 92.9% from the line. It was an incredibly dominating performance by a team that really seems to have hit their stride over the last month or so.

So what will happen on Sunday afternoon when Louisville and Michigan State take the floor at Lucas Oil Stadium? That’s exactly what we’re here to analyze. Here are the particulars:

Louisville-Michigan State Midwest Regional Final – Elite 8 Preview and Prediction

  • StubHub: Midwest Regional Final – Elite 8 Tickets
  • Midwest Regional Breakdown
  • Date: Sunday, March 29
  • TV Time: 2:20 PM on CBS
  • Site: Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, IN
  • Announcers: Gus Johnson and Len Elmore
  • Point Spread: Louisville -7
  • Over-Under: 138

In my original 2009 bracket, I had this as the Elite 8 contest out of the Midwest Region, with Michigan State as the choice to make the Final Four. Here is what I said about the Spartans then:

Honestly, this surprised me a little bit. When I first sat down to look at the brackets, the Spartans were a team I looked at as potentially being ripe for an early upset. But looking deeper, many of their metrics, at least with respect to my personal basketball biases, make them a tournament-ready team. Add in the extra motivation of the Final Four being in Detroit, and I can see this happening.

In the two weeks that have passed since I posted my predictions, the Spartans have beaten Robert Morris, and won close, hard-fought games against USC and Kansas. Louisville, by contrast, has been much more dominating against a less impressive slate of tournament opponents, beating Morehead State, Siena, and Arizona by an average of 22 points a game.

I can see why the line on this game is Louisville -7. The Cardinals are the #1 seed, they hail from the Big East and won both the regular season and conference title, and they have rolled through their three tournament opponents (although Siena put up a bit of a second half fight). Michigan State is the #2 seed, played in a conference that I still think gets less love than it should, and have won without being dominating.

If I was setting a betting line, I would favor Louisville too. I just don’t know that I am going to pick them.

But before I get to my prediction, let’s head over to the Game Predictor to see how it sees this game, based on the same statistical categories we used for all of the Sweet 16 games:

  • Offensive Efficiency: Louisville – 1.065 | Michigan State – 1.056
  • Defensive Efficiency: Louisville – 0.879 | Michigan State – 0.925
  • Assist/TO Ratio: Louisville – 1.281 | Michigan State – 1.171
  • Free Throw %: Louisville – 0.645 | Michigan State – 0.697
  • Defensive Field Goal %: Louisville – 0.394 | Michigan State – 0.415

Louisville-MSU Elite 8 Preview and Spread Pick

So, Louisville wins four out of the five categories, is the higher seed, had a tougher strength of schedule (I assume, though probably not by much), and is favored. It all adds up to the Cardinals probably being an overwhelming favorite in the eyes of Game Predictor.

And that is exactly how it came out:

  • Odds to Win Game: Louisville – 83.1% | Michigan State – 16.9%
  • Most Likely Final Score: Louisville – 74.3 | Michigan State – 65.1
  • Odds to Cover Spread (MSU +7): Louisville – 60.1% | Michigan State – 39.9%
  • Confidence Level: 4 Stars

Michigan State-Louisville Preview and Prediction

I have run every Sweet 16 game and every Elite 8 game but one (UNC-Oklahoma, to come later) through the Game Predictor. This is one of the most overwhelmingly lopsided predictions that has been returned.

And here is the frustrating part for me as I type this: rationally, I agree with the prediction.

Louisville’s metrics are better, they are more talented from top to bottom on their roster, they have a great coach who is certainly Tom Izzo’s peer, and they have passed the “eye test” during the tournament more impressively than Michigan State. So I completely understand why Game Predictor, and many others, think Louisville wins this game by a touchdown or more.

But I really, really, really want to disagree.

Midwest Regional Final Preview, Game Time, SpreadI like Tom Izzo and I’m a big fan of the Spartans’ backcourt of Kalin Lucas and Travis Walton. Plus, I am a Big Ten supporter through and through and would love to see Michigan State return some prestige to our recently struggling (but still underrated!) conference. Mix in the whole Rick Pitino-Kentucky connection, and I will without question be a huge Spartans fan on Sunday night.

However, I am trying to be as objective as possible in making these predictions. The Game Predictor has been a very powerful tool in doing so, and it is hard to ignore the overwhelming numbers above. I did go against Game Predictor during the Sweet 16, with some success (picking Villanova over Duke) and some failure (picking Syracuse over Oklahoma). I am trying to find something, anything to give me a shred of confidence to ignore game predictor here.

Louisville has only lost two games since the calendar turned to February, and has won 13 in a row. During that streak, only 4 of their games were decided by single digits. However, from February 2 through February 12, the Cardinals lost twice, at home to UConn and on the road against Notre Dame. Perhaps these two games offer a clue for what Michigan State can do to slow down this Louisville juggernaut (which I, admittedly, underestimated coming into the tournament.)Louisville-Michigan State Elite 8 Preview, Spread, Game Time

UConn dominated Louisville defensively, winning 68-51. Terrence Williams scored 26 for Louisville, but only five other players scored and the rest of the starters contributed only 10 points. Earl Clark was held to 2-16 shooting while Edgar Sosa and Jerry Smith shot a combined 2-9. As a team, the Cardinals had an Assist/TO ratio of 9/17. Amazingly, UConn went 0-8 from downtown and had a porous 12/16 Assist/TO ratio themselves. But Hasheem Thabeet grabbed 11 boards, blocked 4 shots, and scored 14 points to control the paint.

The Notre Dame-Louisville game was a complete massacre in favor of the Irish. Slumping heading into the game, Notre Dame got 10-16 shooting from downtown by Kyle McAlarney and Ryan Ayers, plus 32 points and 17 rebounds from Luke Harangody. The Irish won 90-57. Louisville shot 39% from the field for the game, and was outrebounded 46-25. It was a thoroughly dominating performance by the Irish that led Rick Pitino to say the following:

“This victory, while humiliating to us, can propel them into something good,” Pitino said. “I’m happy for them. I’m really upset at our players. The way we practiced going into this game and the way we played tonight, our five men were just totally dominated.”

Of course, from that point on, the Louisville Rickpitinowhitesuits have not lost again.

So what can Michigan State take away from these two losses as they try to prepare a blueprint for beating Louisville? First, hope that Louisville comes out completely unprepared to play, like they did against Notre Dame. Assuming that won’t happen, considering a spot in the Final Four is on the line and all, here are some keys for Michigan State:

1 — Own the glass

In these two losses by Louisville, they were outrebounded 82-55. Michigan State has always been a very good rebounding team, but this year’s squad is not one of their best teams on the glass in recent memory. Goran Suton averages 8.0 rebounds a game, with no one else grabbing more than Raymar Morgan’s 5.4. And Morgan only had 1 rebound in 13 minutes of action last night against Kansas, when the Spartans won despite being outrebounded 31-27. UConn and Notre Dame dominated on the boards and won. Michigan State cannot give the Cardinals second chances and they must get a few offensive rebounds of their own.

2 — Make 3s and guard the 3

UConn did not need threes to beat Louisville, but they have Hasheem Thabeet down low and more scoring options than the Spartans have. Plus, Louisville had an off night themselves from downtown in that game. But we know that Louisville will shoot and make their fair share of threes, as they knocked down 299 on the season, with six players making 29 or more. At a minimum, Michigan State needs to battle Louisville to close to a draw from downtown, which means that Chris Allen, Kalin Lucas, and Durrell Summers (and even Suton) need to be shooting well. Last night, Louisville made 14 3s en route to dominating ALouisville-Michigan State Midwest Regional Final Preview and Game Timerizona. If Michigan State can’t force Louisville to be around 25-30% from long range, and make some of their own, it could be a long night.

3 — Take away Terrence Williams or Earl Clark, if not both

It is probably pie in the sky thinking that Michigan State can shut down both Terrence Williams and Earl Clark, especially considering how well both have played recently. But in Louisville’s losses, these two guys typically struggle. Williams had 9 points in a loss to UNLV and just 5 in the Notre Dame loss. Clark had 5 and 11 in the UConn and Notre Dame losses, respectively. If Michigan State can harass Williams and Clark to force them into low percentage shots, Louisville’s explosiveness will be compromised. At the very least, the Spartans need to ensure that one of these guys struggles.

4 — Get to the line and make free throws

Want to know what the “hidden” difference was in the MSU-Kansas game? The Spartans went 16-17 from the line, while Kansas went 11-13. Michigan State has a decided advantage over Louisville in free throw shooting percentage on the season, and they must exploit this. Kalin Lucas needs to get into the lane and draw fouls, and the other Spartans must be strong down low, take contact, and then make their freebies. If Michigan State can steal 5-6 points from the line against Louisville, as they did against Kansas, it will got a long way towards keeping them in the game.

Now, obviously, doing all four of these things is far easier said than done. There are plenty of solid reasons why Louisville was the #1 overall seed in the tournament, and they have proven the committee right thus far in the tournament.

Here are two advantages that I think Michigan State has going into the game:

  1. They are more battle-tested in close games against good teams thus far in the tournament, having pulled out tough Ws over USC and Kansas. Louisville has not faced a team as good as either so far. (Of course, they did win the Big East tournament right before the NCAA Tournament started…)
  2. The carrot at the end of the stick for Michigan State is playing in the Final Four in their own backyard. I don’t really know how much of an advantage this is, as you have to think that Louisville is just as motivated to make the Final Four regardless of where it is being played. But sometimes upsets happen because a team comes together to play for a higher purpose. Detroit is a struggling city, both in terms of economics and the performance of their sports teams, and I am sure that a Spartan trip to the Final Four at Ford Field would be exciting and uplifting for everyone. If Tom Izzo can somehow use this effectively as an extra little nugget of motivation, it could help. How much? Probably not a lot. But if this is a close game, every little advantage will be meaningful.

Michigan State was my original Final Four pick, but I have felt less and less confident in that choice each time I have seen Louisville play in the tournament. And while this is a very solid Michigan State team, I do not view these Spartans as being in the upper echelon of Tom Izzo’s teams in East Lansing. They just seem to one be one player away for being truly elite. UnfortunateMichigan State-Louisville Elite 8 Preview, Prediction, Game Timely, in terms of talent and expectations, that player is on their roster in Raymar Morgan, but it is hard to count on him for any type of game-to-game consistency.

Update: Just caught on SI.com that Raymar Morgan is expected to play tomorrow despite the broken nose he suffered against Kansas. According to Tom Izzo, Morgan “did not play well before the injury and was even less productive after it.”

Everything, in my mind, points to a Louisville victory on Sunday. When you stack up all of the metrics, I think it would take a flight of irrationality and wishful thinking to predict a Spartan victory. So that is why I will suggest that if you are actually thinking of placing money on this game, you should just stop reading right here.

Because I’m sticking with my pick of Michigan State.

Call it an irrational man-crush on Tom Izzo, stubborn Big Ten support, or just an unexplainable gut feeling; but I think Michigan State finds a way to get it done (and obviously covers the spread). The Spartans reaching the Final Four in their own backyard just seems like one of those NCAA Tournament stories that is too compelling not to happen; and while Louisville appears to have most of the advantages heading in, Michigan State is absolutely still good enough to win.

Call me crazy, but I think they will.

Who do you think will win the Midwest Regional Final between Louisville and Michigan State?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Earl Clark, Terrence Williams photo credit: Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images North America

Elite 8: Pittsburgh-Villanova Preview, Analysis, Prediction

Note: This post is from 2009. To view our 2010 March Madness coverage, use the following links:

——————–

This post will analyze the Villanova-Pittsburgh Elite 8 game using a statistical analysis provided by the Game Predictor at ESPN.com, which is powered by TeamRankings.com. For an analysis of how this program works, hop over to the first individual game Sweet 16 preview I put out for UConn-Purdue. The methodology is all explained there.

As you may have noticed, I have an indefatigable excitement level about this year’s NCAA Tournament and analyzing the matchups that will ultimately get us to the Final Four in Detroit. I previewed the UConn-Missouri game earlier today, and while it is a compelling matchup, it is not the game I am looking forward to most tomorrow night.

Jay Wright - Villanova-Pitt Elite 8 Preview, Prediction, Spread PickI cannot wait to see Big East rivals Pittsburgh and Villanova go at eachother for the second time this season — this time with a trip to the Final Four on the line.

Last night, Pittsburgh and Jamie Dixon earned its first trip to the Elite 8 and finally got the “can’t get past the Sweet 16″ monkey off its back. Jay Wright has taken Villanova to two Elite 8s since 2006, but the Wildcats have not reached a Final Four since their magical upset of Georgtown in 1985.

Let’s get right into the particulars of Saturday night’s Elite 8 contest between Villanova and Pittsburgh, and then analyze and predict who will come out on top.

Pittsburgh-Villanova Elite 8 Regional Final Preview and Prediction


Let’s take a look at the Game Predictor analysis first, using the same statistical categories as have been used for each Sweet 16 and Elite 8 prediction so far. (And that, for the record, have helped me to a 4-0 record so far, knock on wood, in the Sweet 16).

  • Offensive Efficiency: Pittsburgh – 1.134 | Villanova – 1.075
  • Defensive Efficiency: Pittsburgh – 0.943 | Villanova – 0.931
  • Assist/TO Ratio: Pittsburgh – 1.520 | Villanova – 1.131
  • Free Throw %: Pittsburgh – 0.673 | Villanova – 0.748
  • Defensive Field Goal %: Pittsburgh – 0.408 | Villanova – 0.401

Pitt-Villanova Preview and Prediction - Elite 8

I think it is interesting to note that while many peoples’ first impressions of Big East basketball revolve around tough, physical, defensive-minded teams, both Pittsburgh and Villanova rank much higher nationally in terms of offensive efficiency than they do for defensive efficiency. Pitt is #3 in offensive efficiency in the country, while Villanova is 29. Defensively, Pitt is #61 while Villanova is #40. While both teams are obviously very solid defensively, it would be unwise to underestimate the offensive prowess of either.

Now that we’ve looked at the stats, let’s see how Game Predictor sees the game going:

  • Odds to Win Game: Pittsburgh – 58.7% | Villanova – 41.3%
  • Most Likely Final Score: Pittsburgh – 73.3 | Villanova – 71.1
  • Odds to Cover Spread (NOVA +2): Pittsburgh – 55.1% | Villanova – 44.9%
  • Confidence Level: 2 Stars

Pittsburgh v Villanova Elite 8 Preview and Game Time

So Pitt is the relatively strong favorite by Game Predictor, holding an advantage in all three prediction categories — although the confidence level is only two stars.

I think to properly analyze this game, we need to go a little deeper and take a look at two very important factors:

  1. The first game these two teams played against eachother this year
  2. The manner in which they have moved through the NCAA Tournament

Let’s look at the latter first.

Villanova-Pitt Elite 8 Preview and PredictionVillanova has beaten a #14 seed, a #6 seed, and a #2 seed and has done it by an average margin of victory of 18.7 points. Ironically, Villanova’s margin of victory has been increasing throughout the tournament while the seeding of their opponent has been decreasing. Considering their dismantling of UCLA and Duke, two very good steams, Villanova has probably been the most dominant team in the 2009 NCAA Tournament.

Pittsburgh, on the other hand, has been squeaking by against lesser competition. They struggled to put away #16 seed East Tennessee State, winning by only 10. They pulled away late from #8 seed Oklahoma State to win 84-76, and then barely beat a very good Xavier team last night 60-55. Totaled, Pitt has an average margin of victory in the tournament of 7.7 points.

Now, we have heard a lot about how Pitt grinds out games and wins close. And while that is partially true, especially against good teams, it does not tell the whole picture. For the season, Pitt won by an average margin of 13.4 points. Villanova, on the other hand, woPitt-Villanova Preview, Prediction, Game Timen by an average margin of 10.3 points. Considering this fact, and the fact that Villanova has played a tougher tournament schedule, it is reasonable to infer than Villanova would be playing closer games in the tournament than Pitt.

Yet, Villanova has looked like a dominant team blowing out good opponents, while Pitt has looked like a very good team that just knows how to win close games. In a game as incredibly close as this one, against two teams that know eachother well, this is a big difference. Pittsburgh had the better regular season overall, but Villanova is clearly playing better basketball right now.

Before we get into the game these two played against eachother earlier this year, I want to quickly discuss free throw shooting. When I see that Villanova shoots 74.8% from the line and that Pitt shoots 67.3% from the line, a giant red flag goes up for me, especially for a game that I think will be as close as this one. One or two points may very well decide this game and Pittsburgh is the team more likely to leave those points at the free throw line.

But look at how Pitt is winning in the tournament. Against Xavier, in a very close game, Pitt shot 63.2% (12-19) from the line while Xavier shot 80% (8-10) from the line. Against Oklahoma State, another close game until the final minute, Pitt shot 65.4% from the line (17-26) while Oklahoma State was a perfect 12-12. So in both games, Pitt shot a much worse percentage, but — and it’s a big “but” — the Panthers outscored Xavier by four from the line and outscored Oklahoma State by five from the line. So while Pitt does not make as high a percentage of their free throws, they are more adept at getting chances and they play solid enough D not to give their opponent lots of chances.Pitt-Villanova Preview, Prediction, Elite 8 Time

And this leads us perfectly into our discussion of the first Villanova-Pittsburgh matchup from this year.

Villanova dominated Pitt 41-26 in the second half on January 28th at home in Philly, eventually winning 67-57. Guess where the game was decided?

You guessed it: at the free throw line.

Pitt shot 58.8% (10-17) while Villanova only shot 67.9%, well below their season average, but made 19-28 attempts. For a perimeter-oriented team like Villanova against a team like Pitt that has a low post presence like DeJuan Blair, these numbers are staggering. Now, I didn’t watch the game, so I have no idea if it was home cooking or if other extraneous, anomalous-type circumstances contributed to the discrepancy.

What I do know is this: if Villanova shoots 11 more free throws than Pitt on Saturday night, Villanova will win.

Here is another stat that surprised me: Villanova shot 880 free throws this season, paced by guard Scottie Reyndols’ 195. Pittsburgh only shot 684 free throws, paced by DeJuan Blair’s 156. These numbers are proof positive that it is not always low post dominance that leads to free throws. Having guards who can attack the basket, like Villanova has in Scottie Reynolds and Corey Fisher, can actually be a much more effective way of taking control of games from the free throw line.

Another important stat from the first meeting between these two teams was the Assist/TO ratio of Levance Fields. For the season, Fields had a ratio of 3.7:1, which is absolutely magnificent. Against Villanova, Fields had 4 assists and 3 turnovers. Contrast that with what Fields has done in Pitt’s two close tournament wins so far: 9 assists, 2 turnovers against Oklahoma State; and 6 assists, 3 turnovers against Xavier. That is a ratio 3:1 over the two games.

However, here are some more ominous stats for Pitt: Duke’s Assist/TO ratio against Villanova was 7:11; UCLA’s was 14:20.

One of Pitt’s great strengths this year, led by Fields, was their 1.5:1 Assist/TO ratio. The Panthers need to protect the ball aNova-Pitt Preview, Prediction, Game Timend be efficient on offense against a Villanova team that has its defense clicking on all cylinders right now.

Okay, so I have painted a pretty bleak picture for Pitt so far. Then why am I torn over who to pick?

For one, Pittsburgh is better at getting easy, high percentage shots in its offense. Look at the field goal percentages on the year: 45.6% for Villanova, 47.9% for Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh is also a better rebounding team, grabbing an average of 2.8 more rebounds per game than Villanova. And Villanova is not as solid as Pitt at taking care of the ball, registering an Assist/TO ratio as a team of only 1.1:1. Pitt went 30-4, was a #1 seed, and had a better overall body of work than Villanova this season for a reason. These are just a few of the reasons.

But at the end of the day, what happened in November, December, January, and February means very little right now. It’s March, and in games between two teams who know eachother well, and where the margin of difference is very small, the hotter team is often the one that comes out on top.

As discussed above, Pittsburgh has played close games in the tournament and has won by getting to the line more than its opponents. In Villanova, Pitt finds a foe that got to the line almost 200 more times than the Panthers did this season. Add the fact that Villanova makes a higher percentage of its shots, and this is an advantage to Villanova.

In addition, to summarize from above, Pitt’s success has been predicated on taking care of the ball and getting high percentage shots. Villanova has held two good teams, Duke and UCLA, to a 21:31 Assist/TO ratio and a combined field goal percentage of 33.6%. I expect Pitt to perform better than Duke and UCLA did in these two areas, but I’m not sure they can reach their season norms of 1.5:1 and 47.9%. To beat a team as hot and as confidScottie Reynolds - Pitt-Villanova Preview and Predictionent as Villanova is right now, I think Pitt need’s to at least get to close to their season averages in these two areas.

In the end, I think it all adds up to a Villanova victory. I originally picked Pitt in my bracket, but upon deeper analysis I think this matchup favors the Wildcats. Considering the manner of their victory over Pitt earlier this year, and the manner in which the two teams have won in the tournament, I just do not see Villanova allowing Pittsburgh to win playing the style the Panthers have been playing. I would not be shocked if Pittsburgh wins, and I would not put ever put a dime on a game like this between two conference foes because too many variables could tip the scales one direction or the other in a single 40-minute game.

But my recommendation would be to definitely take Villanova with the points, because I think Villanova wins straight up.

But not before Nova and Pitt treat us to a terrific 40 minutes of hard-fought, well-played, entertaining basketball.

Who do you think will win the Pittsburgh-Villanova rematch in the East Regional Final Saturday night?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Reggie Redding/DeJuan Blair photo credit: AP Photo/Michael Perez