Why the NHL should ban fighting

The ongoing debate of whether or not to ban fighting in the NHL was rekindled Tuesday night when Montreal Canadiens enforcer, George Parros, hit the ice face first and suffered a concussion in the middle of a fight with Toronto’s Colton Orr.

Thankfully, Parros should be fine, but it was another example of why the fighting debate should continue among the NHL and its players.

Fighting is an integral part of hockey, and it is what makes the sport unique. Part of the reason I love the game is because of the physicality. It’s a sport where you can stand up for yourself and your teammates in different and more violent way than in other sports. But is it time to rethink fighting in the NHL?

I think so.

People who want to ban fighting in the NHL are in the minority. Some NHL general managers – most notably Steve Yzerman – have called for a ban on fighting after Tuesday’s incident, but the move to ban fighting is not very popular among the players. Ninety-eight  percent of NHL players polled during the 2011-12 season oppose a fighting ban, and with percents as high as that, there’s not going to be change any time soon.

If you visit any hockey arena you can see the way the majority of the crowd jumps up and starts yelling in excitement once a fight breaks out. From that you can infer banning the action would be unpopular for fans too. I must admit, I do it too. But I also can’t help but be appalled at such an action.

NHl fighting

When fans cheer the violence on the ice, I am reminded of the Romans cheering on the slaughter of humans in the Colosseum or the thousands of public executions cheered on by the public during the French Revolution. Obviously, no one is being slaughtered in a hockey arena, but the general mentality of human allowing and even cheering such meaningless acts of violence exists today, and I see it in a lot sports fans.

That scares me.

The NFL has ignored concussions and the long-term effects they have on current and former players. That has lead to players living miserable lives and even committing suicide. It seems the NFL is trying to repair that wrong, but that kind of inaction is unforgivable.

I am afraid the NHL may be on the same track as the NFL. I love the physicality of the league, but I can’t morally justify holding on to something so trivial in the grand scheme of life. Especially when people’s lives and mental well-being are potentially at stake.

I believe life is our most precious asset and anyone who takes it away is the worst kind of thief.

The NHL and hockey can still exist without fighting. I just hope it doesn’t take a death for people to the realization fighting needs to be banned.



About Tyler Juranovich

Tyler Juranovich is an Indiana native, a Ball State student, and a senior writer for MSF, where he's been writing about Chicago sports since 2009. His favorite teams are the Chicago Blackhawks and Bears. He's also a lover of reading, music, and movies. Follow him on Twitter (@tylerjuranovich) or email him at tyler.juranovich@gmail.com

Comments

  1. Derick Schaefer says:

    Tyler, great post. George Parros was named in the top 5 most intelligent athletes. Still, he’s made his career as an enforcer. It is sad to see that the game and its current rules puts even the most intelligent in that path.

    I’ll never forget when they argued that nets behind the goal would ruin the game. Good legal checking makes the physical part of the game. . .not fighting.

  2. Kurt Crowley says:

    Parros and Orr have fought each other eight times, amazing considering they were in separate conferences most of the time…

  3. If they ban what hockey has drawn people to the game for years the players might as well take the pads off and play in shorts.Fighting is part of the game like kissing is to romance.

  4. Ahaa, its fastidious dialogue on the topic of this article at
    this place at this blog, I have read all that, so now me also commenting at
    this place.

  5. I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for excellent info I was looking for this info for my mission.

  6. Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is is missing a few factors, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. Seo Plugin

Speak Your Mind