March Madness: A Brief History of the NCAA Tournament At-Large Bid

By 5:00 CT on Sunday, fans of the Washington, Drexel, Texas, South Florida, and Iona men’s basketball teams will have eaten their fill of keratin anxiously waiting to find out whether Greg Gumbel will call their team’s name.

The NCAA Men’s Division I Basketball Tournament Selection Show will end nearly two months of speculation about which teams have done enough to warrant an invitation to the Big Dance. During the weeks leading up to Selection Sunday experts such as our own Andy Bottoms apply their knowledge of the selection process and of the teams that can make a compelling case for an invitation to predict which teams will be in the field of 64.

Of course, the vast majority of Division I teams enter the month of March with the opportunity to clinch an NCAA Tourney bid, sparing their fans an afternoon of nail-biting. 31 of 32 conference champions (sorry Great West) get to play, regardless of what the Selection Committee thinks of them. 30 of these teams are conference tournament winners.

The other 37 invitations have given birth to the cottage Bracketology industry and the concept of the NCAA Tournament Bubble. Unlike professional leagues, which select “wild card” playoff teams based on win-loss record, the NCAA employees a ten-person committee to hand out invitations to its championship. The committee compares teams using several soft criteria, and teams that didn’t qualify automatically can’t be certain of their fate until the bracket comes out on Selection Sunday.

“Back in my day, you had to win your conference to play for a championship.”

The NCAA hasn’t always extended at-large invitations.

The NCAA basketball tournament debuted in 1939, and for the first twelve years teams qualified by winning one of eight district tournaments. The eight district winners would then compete for a national championship. In 1951, the NCAA expanded the field to 16 teams: ten conference winners and six independents. The rule at the time allowed for only one team per conference.

Kansas State and BYU compete in the West Regional of the 1951 NCAA Tournament.

It seems strange now to fill more than a third of the field with independents, but in 1951 42 Division I teams, including seven of the teams in the final AP Top 20 didn’t belong to a conference. By 1973, there were 72 independents, including national powers Notre Dame, Marquette, and Houston. (Back then the NCAA negotiated television deals for all of its schools, so there was less incentive for a school to join a conference. When schools won the right to do their own deals, they flocked to conferences because conferences were better positioned than individual schools to negotiate with TV networks.)

These independents garnered the first “at large” invitations, since they didn’t have a conference to win. But the NCAA couldn’t simply fill its bracket with the independent schools that had the best record or most impressive résumés. The NCAA had to compete for teams with the NIT, a tournament that was just as prestigious and considered by some to be a national championship in its own right. Many independents, including the Seton Hall team that went 30-2 in 1953, opted to go to New York for the NIT instead of to Iowa City or Stillwater, Oklahoma for the NCAAs. In the days before every game was broadcast on TV and/or the Internet, teams gained more exposure from playing in Madison Square Garden than they did by going elsewhere.

Lawyers for the NIT in a 2005 antitrust suit against the NCAA introduced evidence that, as early as 1957, the NCAA was bullying schools into playing in its tournament instead of the NIT. That case was settled out of court when the NCAA bought the NIT.

In 1953 the field increased to 22 teams: 17 conference winners and five independents. For the next 21 seasons the NCAA Tournament invited 22-25 teams, maintaining the rule that each conference could only send one representative. As the NCAA Tournament grew in prestige, top teams that didn’t win their conference grew unhappy about their exclusion. In 1970 South Carolina ended the season as the number six team in the country with a perfect 14-0 record in the ACC. But NC State won the ACC Tournament, and South Carolina was denied a chance to play for a national championship. The following season, the other USC, Southern Cal, was one of the best teams in the country. But the Trojans had the misfortune of playing in the same conference as number-one UCLA, so they could not secure an NCAA Tournament invitation.

Because most conferences at the time didn’t have a tournament, teams often tied for a conference championship. But the one-bid-per-league rule forced conferences to send only one of their champions to the tournament.

The Introduction of the At-Large Bid

In 1974, to pacify second-place (and tied-for-first-place) teams and to further damage the NIT, the NCAA introduced the Collegiate Commissioners Association Tournament. The first CCAT invited eight second-place finishers including Indiana (the eventual winner) and USC (the eventual runner-up).

The CCAT lasted only two seasons because, in 1975, the NCAA expanded to 32 teams and finally allowed more than one team per conference. That year, Indiana and Michigan represented the Big Ten; Kentucky and Alabama represented the SEC; Kansas and Kansas State represented the Big 8; and Louisville and New Mexico State represented the Missouri Valley.

Despite the addition of the at-large conference teams, from 1975 through 1984 all of the champions were conference winners or independents. (In 1983 North Carolina State finished fourth in the ACC but won the ACC Tournament, clinching the automatic bid.) Finally in 1985 Villanova, an at-large team that tied for third in the Big East and didn’t win the conference tournament, won the national championship over conference rival Georgetown. Other notable at-large teams to win the title include Kansas in 1988, Michigan in 1989, Arizona in 1997, and Syracuse in 2003.

Villanova made the most of its at-large bid in 1985, upsetting Georgetown to win a national championship.

As more conferences joined Division I or formed among independents (such as the Big East and Metro conferences), the NCAA field increased. In 1979, the first year in which teams were seeded, 40 teams made the tournament. The following year the NCAA invited 48 teams. The field increased to 52 in 1983 then 53 in 1984 before settling on 64 in 1985.

By the 1990s the NCAA Tournament had stabilized. The 64-team field each year included 30 conference winners and 34 at-large teams. But things got messy in 1999 when eight schools left the WAC to form the Mountain West Conference. Awarding an automatic bid to the new conference would take away an at-large bid. And, for some reason, conferences and school presidents insisted that there be 34 at-large invitations. (They were less concerned about the women’s tournament, which eliminated an at-large bid and stuck at 64.) To stay at 34, the NCAA added an Opening Round game between two of five 16 seeds.

Last year the NCAA added three more at-large invitations. But two of these new at-large teams must play a First Four game on Tuesday or Wednesday before joining the conventional 64-team bracket.

A Subjective Endeavor

Selecting non-conference winners has always been a subjective endeavor. There is no hard criteria for determining which teams make the field and which do not. As any college basketball fan knows well, the Selection Committee considers factors such as won-loss record, quality wins, bad losses, strength of schedule, and record in road and neutral games.

Northwestern: at the mercy of the always unpredictable Selection Committee (Photo by Kiichiro Sato/Associated Press)

The NCAA introduced the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) in 1981 to give the Selection Committee a tool for selecting at-large teams and seeding the field. The RPI formula is (0.25 • a team’s winning percentage) + (0.5 • a team’s opponents’ winning percentage) + (0.25 • a team’s opponents’ opponents’ winning percentage). In 2004 the NCAA adjusted the formula, giving more weight to road games. (A road game counts as 1.4 games; a neutral-site game counts as 1 game; a home game counts as 0.6 games.)

As the 2006 Missouri State Bears could tell you, teams don’t earn NCAA Tourney invitations based on RPI alone. That team finished the season ranked 21st in the RPI but had to settle for the NIT. The Bears were the highest-ranked team ever in the RPI not to play in the NCAA Tournament. By contrast New Mexico made the field in 1999 despite being ranked 74th in the RPI.

The RPI is less a tool for judging teams than it is a tool for judging the quality of a team’s wins and losses. Teams get credit for wins against the top 50 teams and suffer for losses against teams ranked 200 or worse.

RPI ratings were an enigma to teams and fans alike until 1992, when The Collegiate Basketball News and The RPI Report published them and the NCAA provided data to member schools.

So while you’re doing irreparable damage to your cuticles waiting to find out whether Northwestern or Seton Hall or Oral Roberts will be playing on truTV next week, you can distract yourself by reflecting on the long, rich history of at-large NCAA Tournament bids.

About Josh Tinley

Josh Tinley writes the Away From The Action column at Midwest Sports Fans, covering all aspects of sport aside from what actually happens on the field, court, or track. Josh grew up in Indianapolis and graduated from the University of Evansville and Vanderbilt Divinity School. He is the author of Kneeling in the End Zone: Spiritual Lessons From the World of Sports and the managing editor of LinC, a weekly curriculum for teens that explores the intersection of faith and culture. Josh lives outside Nashville with his wife, Ashlee, and children, Meyer (7), Resha Kate (5), and Malachi (3). He will not allow himself to die before the Evansville Purple Aces make another trip to the NCAA Tournament. Follow him on Twitter @joshtinley or send him an e-mail.


  1. Hi! I was just wondering what theme this blog was using .I just created my own blog and wanted to use the theme on this site. If you could either reply to this comment (I visit your blog quite frequently so I’ll see it), post on my Facebook page (psn code gratuit) or send me an email (my email is DulciPolicar [at] gmail [dot] com) I’d really appreciate it!Thanks,Dulci Policar

  2. Aw, this was an incredibly good post. Taking the time and actual effort to create a superb article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a lot and don’t seem to get anything done.

  3. I have noticed that good real estate agents almost everywhere are warming up to FSBO Marketing. They are noticing that it’s in addition to placing a poster in the front property. It’s really regarding building human relationships with these vendors who someday will become consumers. So, if you give your time and efforts to aiding these sellers go it alone : the “Law regarding Reciprocity” kicks in. Good blog post.

  4. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; we have developed some nice procedures and we are looking to trade solutions with other folks, why not shoot me an email if interested.

  5. Your means of explaining all in this article is truly good, all be able to easily be aware of it, Thanks a lot.Feel free to visit my blog post; beach boom cheats

  6. The main gain to jailbreaking an i Phone five is the ability to turn it right into a Wi-Fi hotspot. Analysts and pundits were off the mark with that prediction, as instead Apple chose to release the i Phone 5C as a replacement for the i Phone 5, which in the past the company would have continued to sell at a $99 price point on contract. Beginning today Apple has begun accepting orders for unlocked GSM versions of the i Phone 5S via the firm’s online store.

  7. Hi there exceptional blog! Does running a blog like this require a lot of work? I have no expertise in coding but I was hoping to start my own blog in the near future. Anyhow, should you have any suggestions or tips for new blog owners please share. I know this is off topic nevertheless I simply needed to ask. Cheers!

  8. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything.

  9. I would like to express some thanks to this writer just for rescuing me from this type of circumstance. As a result of looking throughout the the web and obtaining proposals that were not powerful, I believed my life was done. Living minus the solutions to the problems you have resolved by means of your good article is a serious case, as well as the kind which might have badly affected my entire career if I hadn’t noticed your site. Your own know-how and kindness in maneuvering a lot of stuff was vital. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I had not discovered such a step like this. It’s possible to now look forward to my future. Thank you very much for the high quality and effective guide. I will not think twice to propose the blog to any person who should get direction on this subject matter.

  10. Good day! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same subjects? Thanks!

  11. Anyone with wall-to-wall carpet in the home knows exactly how pricey professional carpet cleaning services can be. It might be either your bottom level reservoir or maybe a formula tank. The unit comes with two of these as you will likely always have one in the wash after each use or two.

  12. Keep up the excellent piece of work, I read few articles on this website and I conceive that your weblog is very interesting and holds bands of great information.

  13. The root of your writing while sounding reasonable initially, did not work very well with me after some time. Somewhere within the paragraphs you actually managed to make me a believer but just for a short while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your jumps in assumptions and you would do well to fill in those gaps. When you can accomplish that, I would surely be impressed.

  14. i love my uggs radar jammer car

  15. There are various reasons for it, the foremost being that it is cherishable and lasting. Secondly, more and more people pretend to wholesale jewelry from China instead of buying fashion jewelry one or two in their local stores. There is also stiff competition among the users of these adoration items especially on the women side.

  16. It’s topper credt card if you fold the credit accountthat was sound business exercises. And the other part about this is that it faresn’t feature an one-year rattling exchangeable really.

  17. The baby video monitor can be purchased as a kit with either one or two portable camera’s, however it does accommodate up to 8 camera’s which can be purchased individually. an included secure online viewing portal that enables their customers to access a real time live, full-color video feed from their camera all from anywhere in the world that has internet access. Swings also make great baby sitters while you indulge in the luxury of a shower or a meal without a baby on your hip.

  18. Excellent read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch as I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

  19. Our company is presenting free samples of premium Belgium chocolates. To become allowed, merely respond to our comment with your address and we’ll get it out over the next day.

  20. Hello, this weekend is pleasant for me, because this point in time i am reading this impressive informative article here at my home.

  21. Great weblog here! Also your site quite a bit up fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink in your host? I want my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  22. well! More exciting content and fantastic

  23. Excellent blog post. I absolutely love this website. Keep it up!

  24. I’d like to thank you for the efforts you have put in penning this website. I’m hoping to view the same high-grade content by you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own site now

  25. I every time used to study paragraph in news papers but now as I am a user of web therefore from now I am using net for content, thanks to web.

  26. As a Newbie, I am always browsing online for articles that can help me. Thank you

  27. We are a gaggle of volunteers and starting a brand new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with useful information to work on. You’ve done a formidable activity and our whole group shall be thankful to you.

  28. I love to write. I mean, I really love to write. It’s probably the only passion I have stronger than love. But I need to know what college to go to.. . What college should I go to for Creative Writing?.

  29. Aw, this was a very nice post. Taking a few minutes and actual effort to create a top notch article… but what can I say… I hesitate a whole llot and never manage to get anything done.

  30. Howdy! I know this is sort of off-topic but I had to ask. Does building a well-established blog such as yours take a lot of work? I’m completely new to blogging but I do write in my journal everyday. I’d like to start a blog so I can easily share my experience and views online. Please let me know if you have any kind of ideas or tips for new aspiring bloggers. Appreciate it!

  31. I wanted to write down a simple word to be able to appreciate you for all of the amazing guides you are showing at this website. My time intensive internet investigation has at the end of the day been rewarded with incredibly good content to talk about with my companions. I d suppose that most of us readers are really endowed to exist in a fantastic network with many brilliant professionals with good guidelines. I feel quite fortunate to have encountered your web pages and look forward to plenty of more excellent times reading here. Thank you once more for a lot of things.

  32. Utterly indited written content , appreciate it for information . 3d fiber lashes

  33. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement. Do you know any techniques to help protect against content from being stolen? I’d really appreciate it.

  34. Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to give something back and help others like you helped me.

  35. I am actually happy to read this webpage posts which includes tons of useful data, thanks for providing these kinds of statistics.

  36. I am really impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one today..

  37. Thanks for the marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will often come back later on. I want to encourage you to definitely continue your great posts, have a nice morning!

  38. Good blog! I truly love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS feed which must do the trick! Have a great day!

  39. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I don’t know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already Cheers!

  40. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?

  41. Whoah this blog is excellent i really like reading your posts. Keep up the great paintings! You already know, many persons are hunting round for this info, you can aid them greatly.

  42. This website really has all the information and facts I needed concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

  43. just click the up coming web site

  44. Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more from this post. I’m very glad to see such excellent information being shared freely out there.

  45. Today i,m going to show you how to got a new IPhone 5s, how to got free macbook, how to get free IPad,by legit way i already got 1 ,it’s new distributor for Apple company ,and want to make hard campaign to Apple,

  46. It is truly a nice and helpful piece of info. I’m satisfied that you shared this helpful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  47. Some genuinely wonderful weblog posts on this internet site , regards for contribution.

  48. togel sgp
    here are some links to web-sites that we link to because we feel they’re worth visiting

  49. Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this
    togel sgp

  50. Of course, the vast majority of Division I teams enter the month of March with the opportunity to clinch
    bandar togel

Speak Your Mind