Indiana-Kentucky Preview: Cavernous Georgia Dome Should Not Adversely Affect Sharp-Shooting Hoosiers

This post originally appeared over at AssemblyCall.com, where Andy, Ryan, and I host a regular IU basketball postgame show. Stop by AssemblyCall.com/live as soon as the IU-Kentucky game ends Friday night for immediate analysis and fan reaction.

Before you begin reading this, understand that I acknowledge how small the sample size is that I’m about to analyze. For this reason, I am quick not to make many predictive conclusions in this post.

But the main point I will make is a pretty simple one, so simple that I think even this little bit of anecdotal data can make it.

My one and only goal with this post is to assuage any fears IU fans might have (like the ones discussed here and that we discussed on our Indiana-Kentucky preview show) that playing in the Georgia Dome could negatively affect the Hoosiers’ 3-point shooting.

It won’t.

[Related: Andy ranks the Sweet 16 matchups 1-8.]

georgia-dome-basketball

Might the cavernous Georgia Dome wreak havoc on Indiana's 3-point shooting on Friday night?

Oh sure, Indiana may well have an off shooting night from downtown Friday night. That could very well happen.

But based on the anecdotal evidence from five sets of NCAA Tournament games played at the Georgia Dome, if Indiana – a very, very good 3-point shooting team – does shoot poorly from 3-point range, it will not be the fault of the cavernous Georgia Dome and its ostensibly challenging shooting background.

Since most reasonable observers agree that Indiana probably needs to shoot well from 3-point range to beat Kentucky, like the Hoosiers did back in December (9 for 15), this seemed like a fun statistical jaunt to take. And since I like nerding out about these things, I decided to do just that.

[Related: Andy’s Indiana-Kentucky Preview and Prediction]

A few quick notes

  • In all, five sets of NCAA Tournament games have been played at the Georgia Dome: the 2002 and 2007 Final Fours, as well as the Regionals in 2001, 2004, and 2006. That provides a total of 15 games worth of data and 20 teams. I recognize that this isn’t much to work with. Unfortunately, I did not have time to dig up all of the shooting numbers from the SEC tournaments that have been played there.
  • I am only looking at 3-point shooting percentages here rather than 2-point shooting percentages or overall field goal percentages. Feel free to disagree, but I think the potential effects of a deep shooting background would show up more, or at least be easier to isolate, from 3-point percentages as opposed to overall field goal percentages. If anyone disagrees or wants my reasoning for this, feel free to comment and I’ll explain.
  • All data was ascertained from historical game box scores at ESPN.com and SI.com, as well as historical team stats from StatSheet.com. Here is the spreadsheet I used.

I have posted the data below if you’d like to reference it, but here is a summary of what the data shows:

1. Elite 3-point shooting teams turn in elite 3-point shooting performances at the Georgia Dome in the NCAA Tournament.

Out of the 20 teams that have played NCAA Tournament games in the Georgia Dome, four entered with a season 3-point field goal percentage of 40.0% or better. While 40% may seem like an arbitrary cutoff point, know that only eight out of 345 teams shot 40% or better from downtown this season. So only the elite of the elite typically hit that mark.

Of the six games these four sharp-shooting teams ended up participating in, five resulted in the elite 3-point shooting team shooting better than its season average:

  • 2002 Indiana (41% season average): 8-13 and 10-23 in two Final Four games
  • 2007 Florida (40.9%): 9-22 and 10-18 in two Final Four games
  • 2001 Gonzaga (40.4%): 9-22 in one Regional Quarterfinal game

(Note: for those of you not quick with the math skills, 9-22 equates to 40.91%.)

The one team that didn’t surpass its season average, 2002 Kansas (41.7%), only missed it by a smidgen (39.13%) and still made nine threes in the game.

For the record, these elite 3-point shooting teams went 3-3 in their Georgia Dome games.

Why is this important?

Indiana enters Friday night’s game with a season 3-point percentage of 43.7%, which is a better season percentage than any other NCAA Tournament team has ever entered the Georgia Dome possessing. Unless the Hoosiers make fewer than eight 3-pointers or shoot below 39.13% from downtown, IU will have done something rather dubious that no other sharp-shooting NCAA Tournament team playing in the Georgia Dome has done.

Again, it could very well happen; but based on the anecdotal evidence, blaming a poor shooting night from 3-point range on playing an NCAA Tournament game in the Georgia Dome would be silly because it’s never adversely affected really good 3-point shooting teams before.

If you’re an Indiana fan, which is a likelihood if you’re reading this, that should make you feel good…or at least assuage any fears you may have that our silky stroke from downtown will abandon us in the dome and that we are somehow at a strategic disadvantage because of it.

I think we all feel that Indiana will have a good chance to win if the Hoosiers can hit 8-10 3s and shoot at least 40% clip from behind the arc. This small sample size of anecdotal data suggests that we will.

Now we know what the arena-specific history suggests about IU’s chances for a good shooting night from deep on Friday night, but how about for Kentucky?

2. Above average (but not elite) 3-point shooting teams tend to turn in below average 3-point shooting performances at the Georgia Dome in the NCAA Tournament.

The median 3-point percentage in college basketball this year was 34.0%, a number that eight teams actually ended up settling on. I’ll use 2012 as a representative example of history and call any team that entered an NCAA Tournament game at the Georgia Dome with a season 3-point percentage above 34% but below 40% an “above average” 3-point shooting team.

For the record, Kentucky’s season 3-point percentage of 37.5% is 47th this season, so they are in the upper 15% of college basketball teams this year. They aren’t elite like Indiana is, but the Wildcats have still been pretty effective from downtown.

In all, 14 teams have entered an NCAA Tournament game at the Georgia Dome with a season 3-point shooting percentage between 34% and 40%. Scroll down if you want to see each team’s individual performance by game, but the performances can be summarized thusly:

  • 16 times out of a possible 20, the above average shooting team shot below its season average.
  • 13 out of those 20 times, the above average shooting team shot below 33%.
  • 13 out of the 20 times the above average 3-point shooting team made six or fewer 3s in a game.

This anecdotal analysis suggests that above average but not elite shooting teams tend to struggle a bit more than usual from downtown in the Georgia Dome in the NCAA Tournament, and they usually won’t shoot and/or hit an inordinate amount of 3s in a single game. Exceptions to this are 2001 Penn State (13-33), 2006 Texas (10-26), and 2006 West Virginia (15-33).

What does this mean for Indiana?

We know that the Hoosiers tend to struggle defending the 3-point line, and we also know that they may have to play zone at some point during the game, which could lead to open 3s. If the history of above average but not elite 3-point shooting teams in the Georgia Dome holds, Kentucky will more than likely make a 3-pointer about once in every three shots. I think Indiana would happily live with that, all things considered.

This is probably a good time to note that this analysis does not in any way account for the effect the opposing defenses may have had on the 3-point field goal percentages in these Georgia Dome NCAA Tournament games. But since no less an authority than Ken Pomeroy considers offensive 3-point field goal percentage to essentially be a defense-free statistic, I’m okay with that.

So, let’s quickly summarized what we’ve learned so far:

  1. Indiana fans shouldn’t fear that the Georgia Dome will unduly hinder the Hoosiers’ 3-point shooting.
  2. Indiana fans also shouldn’t fear, based on the historical probability, that Kentucky will have anything more than just an average shooting night from the behind the arc.

Sure, this doesn’t account for the myriad other variables that will determine who has more points at the end of 40 minutes, but 3-point shooting has been an important variable in many of Indiana’s biggest wins this year. Thus, it’s nice to at least know that nothing about the history of NCAA Tournament games in the Georgia Dome suggests that 3-point shooting will be any less or more of a factor than it would be anywhere else simply because it’s a dome. If anything, the history of the arena tends to favor IU.

But does this really mean anything?

Let’s go one level deeper…

3. Good 3-point shooting has not been especially predictive of success in NCAA Tournament games in the Georgia Dome.

The two worst 3-point shooting teams to play in an NCAA Tournament foursome at the Georgia Dome both won their foursome.

  • In 2002, Maryland won the National Championship despite entering the Final Four with a season 3-point percentage of 33.9% and shooting just 30% over the two games.
  • In 2006, LSU won the South Regional and went to the Final Four despite having a 32.4% season 3-point percentage and shooing a paltry 20% (5-25) over the two games.

The only time the best 3-point shooting team emerged victorious out of the Georgia Dome was the 2007 Final Four, when Florida won it all, thanks in large part of Lee Humphrey’s sharp shooting.

Could Indiana be the next team to follow in Florida’s footsteps as en elite 3-point shooting that emerges from a Georgia Dome foursome victorious?

Who knows.

But at least we all now know that it won’t be the arena’s fault if the Hoosiers do not.

**********

Here is the data:

georgia-dome-shooting-1

george-dome-shooting-2



About Jerod Morris

I love words. I write for Copyblogger and founded MSF, The Assembly Call, & Primility. I practice yoga, eat well, & strive for balance. I love life. Namaste. Say hi on Twitter, Facebook, & G+.

Comments

  1. i like it… nicely done. 

  2. I always emailed this web site post page to all my associates, for the reason that if like to read it then my links will too.

  3. HGo90J You should participate in a contest for the most effective blogs on the web. I will suggest this web site!

  4. It is tough to discover educated males and females on this topic, however you seem like you realize anything you could be talking about! Thanks

  5. Merely wanna state that this really is really helpful , Thanks for taking your time to write this.

  6. My brother suggested I might like this website. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You cann at imagine just how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  7. Im grateful for the blog.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  8. Great blog post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  9. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I ave joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I ave shared your website in my social networks!

  10. Thank you ever so for you blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  11. Wow, incredible blog layout! How lengthy have you ever been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The total glance of your web site is fantastic, let alone the content!

  12. This unique blog is obviously cool and also diverting. I have found a bunch of useful things out of this amazing blog. I ad love to go back over and over again. Cheers!

  13. Great article post.Thanks Again. Want more.

  14. Fantastic article post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  15. Thank you ever so for you blog post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  16. Very neat blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  17. Major thanks for the article.Thanks Again. Great.

  18. logiciel gestion finance logiciel blackberry desktop software

  19. A round of applause for your article post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  20. Great, thanks for sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  21. Thank you for this entry. Looking forward to next one.

  22. It as going to be finish of mine day, but before finish I am reading this great article to increase my know-how.

  23. Some really nice stuff on this site, I it.

  24. Very good blog.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  25. Wow, superb weblog layout! How lengthy have you been running a

  26. This is a topic that is close to my heart Many thanks! Exactly where are your contact details though?

  27. I know this site provides quality based content and additional material, is there any other web
    page which gives such stuff in quality?

  28. Very good blog article. Awesome.

  29. Some truly great blog posts on this website , thankyou for contribution.

  30. Thanks for the article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  31. This is a topic which is close to my heart Take care! Where are your contact details though?

  32. Wow, great blog post. Awesome.

  33. Thank you for your post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  34. Hey, thanks for the article.Really thank you! Awesome.

  35. Major thanks for the post.Really thank you! Great.

  36. Thank you ever so for you article.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  37. Thanks for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  38. Thanks for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  39. Thanks a lot for the blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  40. Wow, awesome blog layout! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you make blogging glance easy. The full glance of your web site is magnificent, let alone the content!

  41. Really enjoyed this article post.Much thanks again.

  42. I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking all over for this! Thank God I found it on Google. You have made my day! Thank you again.

  43. SACS LANCEL ??????30????????????????5??????????????? | ????????

  44. Major thanks for the blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  45. It as not that I want to duplicate your web-site, but I really like the style and design. Could you let me know which style are you using? Or was it custom made?

  46. Say, you got a nice article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  47. Looking around I like to surf around the internet, regularly I will go to Stumble Upon and follow thru

  48. Great article post.Much thanks again. Great.

  49. I appreciate you sharing this article post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  50. pretty valuable material, overall I feel this is really worth a bookmark, thanks

  51. Your style is really unique compared to other people I ave read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this site.

  52. Very good post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.

  53. You can certainly see your expertise in the work you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers such as you who aren at afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.

  54. pretty useful stuff, overall I imagine this is worth a bookmark, thanks

  55. Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article post. Great.

  56. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I ave joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!

  57. garcinia cambogia reviews from users 1st, examine should your url is obtainable. After that decide on the world-wide-web ron lauren sale made style out of many web templates. dietworks pure garcinia cambogia reviews

  58. I will not talk about your competence, the article simply disgusting

  59. wh0cd742021 cephalexin no rx

  60. Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your blog? My blog site is in the exact same area of interest as yours and my users would really benefit from some of the information you present here. Please let me know if this okay with you. Regards!

  61. Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and aid others like you helped me.

  62. Say, you got a nice blog post.Really thank you!

  63. This website definitely has all of the info I needed about this subject and didn at know who to ask.

  64. Wow! This could be one particular of the most useful blogs We ave ever arrive across on this subject. Actually Great. I am also an expert in this topic therefore I can understand your effort.

  65. Major thankies for the blog article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  66. I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic jdhipss. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent info I was looking for this information for my mission.

  67. The top and clear News and why it means a good deal.

  68. Very good blog article.Thanks Again. Great.

  69. Just what I was searching for, thankyou for putting up.

  70. This will be a excellent site, could you be involved in doing an interview about how you developed it? If so e-mail me!

  71. pretty handy stuff, overall I imagine this is well worth a bookmark, thanks

  72. Major thanks for the blog.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  73. Very good information. Lucky me I found your website by accident (stumbleupon). I ave book-marked it for later!

  74. Really enjoyed this blog post. Really Great.

  75. This awesome blog is no doubt interesting and besides informative. I have found helluva interesting things out of this amazing blog. I ad love to go back every once in a while. Thanks a lot!

  76. You made some respectable points there. I looked on the internet for the problem and located most people will go together with together with your website.

  77. written. In my opinion, it might bring your website a little bit more interesting.

  78. Lovely just what I was looking for.Thanks to the author for taking his time on this one.

  79. you may have an incredible weblog right here! would you like to make some invite posts on my blog?

  80. Wow, great post.Much thanks again. Great.

  81. pulp fiber suspension, transported towards the pulp suspension into a network of institutions, right into a fiber network in the wet state and then into

  82. Really appreciate you sharing this post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  83. What as up, I just wanted to mention, I disagree. Your post doesn at make any sense.

  84. Thank you ever so for you blog.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  85. there, it was a important place in the court.

  86. Thanks for helping out, excellent info. Nobody can be exactly like me. Sometimes even I have trouble doing it. by Tallulah Bankhead.

  87. wonderful points altogether, you simply won a new reader. What could you recommend about your publish that you simply made some days in the past? Any positive?

  88. You made some good points there. I checked on the internet for more info about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this web site.

  89. Right now it appears like Movable Type is the preferred blogging platform out there right now. (from what I ave read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  90. Perfect piece of work you have done, this internet site is really cool with wonderful info.

  91. It as difficult to find knowledgeable people for this subject, but you seem like you know what you are talking about! Thanks

  92. Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.

  93. I think other site proprietors should take this site as an model, very clean and excellent user friendly style and design, let alone the content. You are an expert in this topic!

  94. Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is wonderful, as well as the content!

  95. What as up, just wanted to say, I liked this post. It was helpful. Keep on posting!

  96. Thanks-a-mundo for the post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  97. Well I really enjoyed reading it. This post provided by you is very useful for good planning.

  98. This blog is obviously interesting as well as factual. I have picked up many useful stuff out of this source. I ad love to return over and over again. Thanks a lot!

  99. This is the worst post of all, IaаАа’б‚Т€ТšаЂаŒаАа’б‚Т€ТžаБТžve study

  100. Im thankful for the blog post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  101. That is a very good tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere. Simple but very accurate info Many thanks for sharing this one. A must read post!

  102. I think this is a real great post. Want more.

  103. Rattling fantastic info can be found on site.

  104. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this post plus the rest of the site is extremely good.

  105. It as best to take part in a contest for among the best blogs on the web. I will advocate this site!

  106. Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  107. This unique blog is obviously interesting and also diverting. I have picked up many handy things out of it. I ad love to go back over and over again. Cheers!

  108. You ought to experience a contest personally of the finest blogs on-line. IaаАа’б‚Т€ТšаЂаŒаАа’б‚Т€ТžаБТžm going to suggest this page!

  109. Really enjoyed this post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  110. Welcome to Affordable Auto Body CARSTAR Auto Body Repair Experts Franklin, WI

  111. Thank you for your article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  112. You made some first rate points there. I regarded on the web for the problem and found most individuals will go along with together with your website.

  113. I really liked your blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  114. Real fantastic information can be found on web blog. I am not merry but I do beguile The thing I am, by seeming otherwise. by William Shakespeare.

  115. It as hard to find knowledgeable people about this topic, but you

  116. much healthier than its been in some time. Manning,

  117. where do you buy grey goose jackets from

  118. I truly appreciate this post.Really thank you! Great.

  119. Valuable information. Lucky me I found your web site by accident, and I am shocked why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

  120. Very good information. Lucky me I came across your site by chance (stumbleupon). I ave saved as a favorite for later!

  121. I value the article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  122. Some genuinely great articles on this web site , thankyou for contribution.

  123. This info is worth everyone as attention. How can I find out more?

  124. Very good article post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  125. Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  126. Muchos Gracias for your blog.Thanks Again. Great.

  127. Im thankful for the blog.Really thank you!

  128. Im no pro, but I consider you just crafted the best point. You certainly understand what youre talking about, and I can truly get behind that. Thanks for staying so upfront and so straightforward.

  129. Rope chains have braided, weaved hyperlinks that give a really distinctive, classic
    appearance. Because of their intricate composition, they’re extraordinarily sturdy.

Speak Your Mind