7 Bold Predictions for Super Bowl XLIV

From the offseason to training camp to preseason games to the regular season to the playoffs, this has been a typically exciting NFL season. Tonight, another season comes to a close with the Greatest Spectacle in Sports (and Television), the Super Bowl.

The best team from start to finish in the AFC, the Colts, will face the best team from start to finish in the NFC, the Saints. With both teams staying relatively quiet this week – the only real bulletin board material has come from the Colts’ former coach – there is only thing left to do on Super Bowl morning: take a stab at predicting what will happen.

Here are seven predictions for what we will see tonight in Super Bowl XLIV.

Reggie Bush already made quite a catch snaring Kim Kardashian; can he make a few more big catches tonight?

Reggie Bush already made quite a catch snaring Kim Kardashian; can he make a few more big catches tonight?

1. Reggie Bush will have more receiving yards than Austin Collie.

I have no statistical data to back this one up. Collie had more receptions and yards during the regular season as he should since his job is to catch the ball and run with it. This postseason Collie is averaging 5.5 catches per game for 87.5 yards while Bush has averages of three catches for 28.5 yards.

There is just something about this as I type it that feels right. It is much like the feeling I had last weekend when I said that DeSean Jackson would win Pro Bowl MVP. He finished with 101 yards on eight catches and two touchdowns, and if his team would have scored more points I would have been right. I’m all about the small victories in life, and my DeSean Jackson pick was one of those.

2. Alexander Ovechkin will have the same number of goals as Drew Brees touchdown passes.

I am not what one would call a hockey fan. I know zero hockey players under the age of 40 not named Crosby or Ovechkin unless they attended the University of North Dakota. I don’t like to give hockey much credit on anything, but it’s time has come. Congratuations NHL, you did it.

Scheduling Penguins vs. Capitals on the afternoon before the Super Bowl was genius. By the time the game will start the NFL Network will have lost another analyst due to criminal charges and Cris Carter will have pulled a Bert Blyleven over on ESPN and everyone will be scared for the final 217 hours of pregame coverage. Even Stu Scott’s fake eye will be looking straight. Hockey will seem like such a great idea that Tony the Tiger will have an aneurysm trying to explain how happy he is to have a break from pregame coverage.

I really hope all of the above happens. By the way, go Penguins. I don’t like Russian hockey players. They are the reason I can’t follow the sport. Way too hard to pronounce their names, let alone remember them.

3. At the end of the game, I will have as many sacks as Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis.

Freeney is not healthy and will not be a factor. I don’t care what any report says. Robert Mathis will be healthy and will also not be that much of a factor. The media is extremely fixated with Peyton Manning not getting sacked often, but what about Drew Brees?

The Vikings led the league in total sacks this year and managed to get only one sack against the Saints two weeks ago. I’m not an expert on the Colts defensive front, but I have confidence saying that it is not as good as Minnesota’s. A lesser line and the best player on said line being injured does not equal Drew Brees going down. Not in my book anyway.

4. Darren Sharper will have more sacks than interceptions.

Yes, I am fully aware this is the second straight prediction involving sacks.

Two weeks ago the Saints ran a lot of safety blitzes on the Vikings. Sharper never got a sack, but sure did get to see Mr. Favre up close a few times.

I think Sharper will get his sack within the first two possessions, because if it doesn’t happen then, it probably won’t happen. According to ESPN Peyton Manning is a good quarterback and is also pretty smart. The Saints won’t have all game to get in his head.

5. At least one member of Jersey Shore will be shown during the telecast.

I don’t like it either, but there HAS to be at least three of them in Miami right now right? Hopefully they don’t make their way into the actual stadium and get some lame interview from the stands where JWoww is just staring at the JumboTron seeing if there is an angle on earth that make her boobs look good while Snooky is looking for a juicehead carrying around a jar of pickles.

For some reason Darren Rovell has been going crazy over the prop bet involving Archie Manning shots during the game. Does anyone really care what Archie is up to? I was more interested in Prince during the Vikings game than I am about Senor Manning. The O/U is 4.5 by the way. Insane.

If the Colts fulfill Drew's prediction, their stoic coach Jim Caldwell probably will not be so expressive when he gets doused with gatorade.

If the Colts fulfill Drew's prediction, their stoic coach Jim Caldwell probably will not be so expressive when he gets doused with gatorade.

6. The Colts will win and cover the spread.

I would really like to see the Saints win but I just don’t think it will happen. Peyton Manning is in beast mode and I just don’t see any way that the Colts will be in a position at the end of the game where they can’t win. If there is time on the clock, Peyton will find a way to score. He has done it all year and he will do it again on Sunday if need be.

While writing this I was trying to think of some good predictions, so I asked one of my friends who is notorious for giving strange opinions on football. His answer? 3-2 Colts.

I disagree. 34-22 Colts. Everyone loves a good two point conversion.

7. Peyton Manning will NOT win MVP.

I should probably have another name to throw out here. I’ll go with Donald Brown. He’ll bust a long +40 yard touchdown run in the second quarter and score on a screen play in the fourth to seal the deal.

Now it’s your turn. What is your prediction for tonight’s game?

Who will win Super Bowl XLIV?

  • Indianapolis Colts (47%, 988 Votes)
  • New Orleans Saints (53%, 1,123 Votes)

Total Voters: 2,106

Loading ... Loading ...

Share This Article:


Email Article Email Article



About Drew Lange

Drew is a student at North Dakota State University in Fargo, ND. He is a life long Vikings fan and distracts himself from their futility by watching a lot of TV and listening to a lot of music, even though his parents don't understand the appeal. Follow on twitter (@drewlange) or send an email to d.lange9@gmail.com

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JerodMSF JerodMSF

    I agree with you that the Colts will win, but I think the Saints will cover.

    And picking Donald Brown to be MVP is truly a bold pick. I just don't see any way Peyton doesn't win it if the Colts win. He is everything about their offense, and unless the Colts win 6-3 (and there is no way that's happening with these two offenses), I think it'll go to Peyton.

    BUT…we have seen unlikely Super Bowl heroes before (Larry Brown, anyone?). If it is Brown, you should make a shirt that says "I picked Donald Brown to be Super Bowl MVP…you didn't" and wear it around town for a week.

  • Johnyn MAck

    You are right those are some pretty bold predictions indeed!

    Jess
    http://www.internet-anonymity.se.tc

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • http://twitter.com/drewlange @drewlange

    Uh oh. Ovechkin already has a hat trick and the third period isn’t over yet. I thought this could happen but I expect him to get two.

  • http://twitter.com/Acoon33 @Acoon33

    Drew Lange,
    "I dont like to give hockey much credit for anything".
    Are you kidding me? How those words are written in an article involving football is unimaginable. Not to get into a pissing contest but Football is a joke, seriously. Football is just another sport like Baseball, its a dull and lackluster performance that needs scandals and conspiracies to make it stay mainstream. Yes, Football is fun to play and I love my Steelers but its boring to the point if it weren't for all the commercials and drama it would be much less "interesting" as you Drew Lange like to put it. In fact, I do believe a poll was conducted recently this week stating that over half of Americans are looking forward to the Super Bowl commercials over the game, haha try getting those same results for any series of the Stanley Cup Finals. Not to mention FACTS like during an average Football game the ball only moves for 11-13 minutes, but thats not interesting. Or the FACT that over half the teams that win a COIN TOSS for overtime end up winning the game. Yeah thats interesting, I bet Minnesota would have had a fair chance a couple weeks ago if this wasn't the case. The FACT is Football is flawed by a shady and poorly advised review system, lackluster performance overshadowed by advertising, and a game strategy that fails unless your name is head or tails. Its biased writers like yourself that make unintelligent and irrelevant accusations. So I guess in retrospect I cannot blame you for your comments because after all without your Kim Kardashians, not much credit could be given to Football. Well congrats Drew Lange, you’re about as insightful and interesting as those Football announcers who make such "intelligent" remarks as "If he wouldn’t have made that catch that would not have been a touchdown, great catch!" Yeah, nice one genius.
    Bravo for meeting the status quo Drew! Next up, A Real Interesting and Intelligent Article NOT by Drew Lange!

  • http://twitter.com/drewlange @drewlange

    Didn't hockey get a major coverage boost just a year or two ago with Tie Domi running his mouth about women floating around locker rooms in the NHL? Don't give me the woman excuse. People are much more interested in hockey highlights when Carrie Underwood shows up.

    Yes, football has gaps in time between plays, but it is no different than hockey. "Hey guys, let's skate for 30 seconds then go sit down again." Same thing. Football actually stays on the field, they just huddle. At least there is scoring in football.

    I could go on but I don't want to. I'm not surprised that I got attacked by a hockey fan since it happens constantly. If hockey fans would just relax maybe I would follow the sport, but when you get attacked by its fans there doesn't seem to be much point. Not once did I say anything bad or take anything away from hockey in my column. I simply stated I'm not a hockey fan. What's the big deal?

  • JMM

    Hey genius there is scoring in hockey too, except it makes sense. One goal counts as one goal not like basketball or football where one basket or one touchdown is worth more points than it should be. I’d say if you football scored the same way as hockey the scores would be similar, Football really isn’t high scoring they just get too many damned points. And hockey is a faster paced sport than football, unless you get 2 shit teams.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention 7 Super Bowl XLIV Predictions - Saints-Colts Prediction - Reggie Bush Kim Kardashian Picture -- Topsy.com