Friday Morning Would…You Rather Own Mohamed Massaquoi or Pierre Garcon?

Before we begin this Friday’s Morning Would column, I want to make a declaration about one of its subjects, Browns rookie WR Mohammed Massaquoi.

And that declaration is as follows: henceforth on Midwest Sports Fans, Mohammed Massaquoi will be known as MoMass. This a common practice among fantasy writers and players who are lazy and don’t feel like typing out long, complicated names (ex. Maurice Jones-Drew is “MJD” and DeAngelo Williams is “DAW”).

You see, as much as I love MoMass, both as a building block for the Browns and as a fantasy sleeper for the balance of 2009, his name is one of those difficult ones that is very hard to get through typing without making a mistake.

Here, I’ll try a couple of times typing it at my normal rate without stopping: Mohammed Maaquia; Mohammed Massaquoi, Mohammed Massaqoo, Mohammed Massaquoi, Mohammed Massaqio.

As you can see, the second and fourth attempts were spot on. But 40% accuracy is not acceptable to be. so I’m shortening it to MoMass and that’s that.

And now we can move on to more important subjects…

Two of the hottest names in the WR sleeper category this week — and certainly two of the players that I have been asked about the most in the comments section of the Week 5 start em, sit em post — are MoMass and Pierre Garcon.

This morning, I will analyze which of these two players I’d rather have on my team in Week 5 and beyond.

[Editor's Note: While preparing to analyze MoMass and Pierre Garcon, I just realized that MoMass only has one "m" in his first name, meaning that not one of my attempts to spell his name right above was correct. Yeah...I'm sticking with MoMass.]

mohamed massaquoi v pierre garcon - start or sit, week 5 projections - fantasy footballBefore we analyze, let’s quickly take a look at the stats these two talented young receivers have compiled so far this year:

  • MoMass: 10 rec, 179 yards, 0 TDs
  • Pierre Garcon: 10 rec, 207 yards, 2 TDs

Clearly, Garcon has a leg up on MoMass so far in 2009 because of the two TDs. However, remember that in fantasy football, as in the stock market, the past is only useful as a guide and is not always a surefire predictor of what will happen moving forward.

I propose that Mohamed Massaqoui (felt like typing it out…) will be the more valuable receiver in Week 5 and for the rest of 2009 for the following reasons:

1 – Opportunity

With the recent trade of Braylon Edwards, and his sterling 8-catch performance last Sunday, MoMass has become the clear #1 receiver for the Browns. Former Jet Chansi Stuckey has more experience, but has never worked with Derek Anderson.

So much of a player’s fantasy value is tied up in the number of targets he will get on a weekly basis. MoMass should see between 8-15 targets every week for the rest of the season, mainly because the Browns are so thin on experience at receiver. Plus, Derek Anderson has a tendency to lock in on certain receivers and they seem to have already developed a nice rapport.

This does not necessarily mean that MoMass is a better player than Garcon (although I think he is), but he will have more of an opportunity to get the ball in his hands than Garcon will have competing with Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, Austin Collie, and eventually Anthony Gonzalez, for targets.

2 – And more opportunity

I love the Browns, but I’ll be the first to admit that they are not a good team this year. There is a very good chance that the Browns will find themselves losing in a lot of games, which will force Derek Anderson to take to the air as the team tries to come back. Guess who will be the #1 beneficiary of this?

mohamed massaquoi v pierre garcon - start or sit, week 5 projections - fantasy footballMoMass.

I don’t point this out to say that the Browns will throw the ball more than the Colts; they won’t. But a lot of people consider Garcon a better option because of the offense he is in, which is more pass-first than the Browns. While this is true, just keep in mind that the Browns will be throwing a lot this year and probably will not have too many opportunities to salt games away in the 4th quarter.

Those are the two main reasons why I’d go with MoMass over Garcon for the rest of 2009: it’s all about opportunity. These are two young and talented WRs who should have solid careers in the NFL, but you want the one who is going to have the most opportunities to make plays this season.

Mohamed Massaquoi will be that guy.

Looking specifically at Week 5, even though Garcon and the Colts are facing the awful Titans pass defense on Sunday Night Football, I’d go with MoMass. The Browns are playing a Bills team that has a banged up secondary, and D.A. will no doubt be locked on in on MoMass with Edwards gone and little time to work with Stuckey.

  • Mohamed Massaquoi Week 5 projection: 7 rec, 97 yards, 1 TD
  • Pierre Garcon Week 5 projection: 3 rec, 69 yards, 0 TD

Would would you rather have?

Which young WR would you rather have on your fantasy roster?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

**********

* – Pierre Garcon photo credit: Arin It Out

* – Mohamed Massaquoi photo credit: Joshua Gunter, The Plain Dealer

Share This Article:


Email Article Email Article



About Jerod Morris

A proud graduate of Indiana University, Jerod Morris founded Midwest Sports Fans in August of 2008 and has been its Managing Editor every day since. Follow him on Twitter (@JerodMorris) for MSF updates, sports discussion, and a compelling daily assortment of funny and interesting links.
In addition to his work at MSF, Jerod hosts the fast-growing Indiana basketball postgame show The Assembly Call and provides regular music recommendations at IndieChristmas.com. He also helped develop the Synthesis Managed WordPress Hosting platform on which MSF and all of his other sites are run.

  • http://clevesportsflow.blogspot.com Ryan

    One thing you didn't mention..

    Garcon is not the #1 WR in Indy – that's Reggie Wayne. Wayne will draw a lot of double teams which will open things up for Garcon.

    MoMass is the #1 in Cleveland, so if any WR is going to get doubled it will be him.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JerodMSF JerodMSF

    This is a good point Ryan and thanks for making it.

    Garcon will certainly have an easier time in his offense than MoMass will have in his. However, I think the additional targets still tips the scales in MoMass' favor. He was a four-year player at Georgia who was not in a Texas Tech-style offense where he only ran two routes. He and Robiskie were both very polished players expected to be able to contribute right away. Thus, I think dealing with double-teams and the typical rookie transitions will be a little bit easier for a guy like MoMass than, say, even someone like Crabtree. His ceiling may not be as high, but I do think he's prepared to produce well right away, even as a #1.

    Luckily, the Browns got Chansi Stuckey in the trade with the Jets, who is a decent WR and will be able to take some pressure off of MoMass. I think eventually we'll see lots of 3- and 4-receiver sets with Furrey, Cribbs, and Robiskie running around, which should help to open the field a bit for the guys on the outside.

  • Josh Lipinski

    This is why I'm fucking beyond-confused about whether or not Eric Mangini even knows what the hell he's doing. Ships Winslow off, gives away Mark Sanchez to the Jets, and gives away Braylon Edwards. Tom Cruise was in a decent movie called "The Last Samurai", and it proved that you can bring all the swordsmen in the world to a gunfight, and you'd be retarded to think you won't get absolutely slaughtered.

    So Mangini gives away all his offensive weapons, then he's left w/a guy like Massaquoi who clearly made an impact because they gave Braylon Edwards a 10-yard cushion and the safety and linebackers cheated towards him, but now Braylon Edwards is gone. So they give Massaquoi a 10-yard cushion and the safety and linebackers cheat towards him, which opens the field up for…for…umm, for…(sorry guys)…I'm thinking here…for…

  • Josh Lipinski

    Robiskie and Massaquoi are not "more polished" than Crabtree. Where do you come up with that?? He spent only 2 years playing in college, but absolutely SLAUGHTERED freshman and 2-year-span records while playing w/a quarterback who happens to own the NCAA record for throwing TDs.

    Furrey is not an impressive receiver. That's why they are putting him at safety. His mind's writing checks that his body just can't cash. He can think the game, which is good for a safety, but he just doesn't have the physical ability, it's pretty clear. Cribbs can't be a WR, he gets too tired, and it's smarter to stick him on special teams.

    I'll put dollars down that Crabtree's first start is more productive than any game Mohamed Massaquoi has the rest of the season, and 95% of the reason is that Edwards is no longer in town. Damn would I love to see Massaquoi finish the year w/10 TDs, 80 receptions, and 1,000+ yards, but it's not going to be easy.

  • Josh Lipinski

    Chansi Stuckey – I have never heard of that name in my life until the Edwards trade. I'm not an all-knowing stats guy, but I'm pretty knowledgable, I get ESPN the Mag and Sports Illustrated in the mail, check espn.com every day, and usually will hit up nfl.com on Monday and Tuesday mornings, and play Yahoo fantasy football, and I get together to play football every Sunday w/guys who are also like-minded athletes. And never have I heard of Chansi Stuckey. Not saying he's not a bad player, just saying he's no fucking justification of giving away a superstar like Braylon Edwards.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JerodMSF JerodMSF

    Josh, the draft day trade is debatable…and we won't know how to judge that until 4-5 years from now when we see how good Sanchez becomes and how impactful of a player Mack is, but I don't think you can argue with trading away an injury prone head-case (Winslow) and a petulant, unproductive WR (Edwards) who would be leaving after the season anyway. Yes, both guys are talented, but they are not part of the long-term solution in Cleveland, which is what Mangini is building towards.

    And understand: I am not totally on board with Mangini, nor did I agree with his hire, but I don't have a problem with moving Winslow and Edwards, two guys who are hell for a locker room when things are not going well. They are talented front-runners, plain and simple, but not guys who are going to be productive members of a rebuilding project.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JerodMSF JerodMSF

    Josh, in terms of their ability to understand an NFL offense, yes Robiskie and Massaquoi both are more polished than Crabtree. When Crabtree's own offensive coordinator in SF says he only ran two plays in college and that it will take him a while to get up to speed, you know that he was drafted on talent…not polish. And that's fine; it's not necessarily a knock on Crabtree, I said it only because the Browns are not as destitute at the WR position as they seem.

    As for Crabtree's first start…I wish the guy no ill-will. but I think he is going to struggle. He was going to have a rough first year anyway, and now that he's been out for so long, and is on a run-first, run-second team, I don't really think — at least from a fantasy perspective — that he has anywhere near the value of MoMass for this season. The future is another story, but I have no faith in Crabtree's ability to be a productive player this season.

    And though you may not know who Chansi Stuckey is, he is a decent player. He is more suited to being a #3-type option than the #1/#2 option he'll be in Cleveland, but he's a young guy with a good attitude that the Browns can build around. And that's what Mangini is looking for right now. This team is not going to compete this year, we know that. But he wants to change the attitude in the locker room, and you don't do that with ass clowns like Braylon Edwards bitching and moaning and dropping passes on the way to a 0-catch day.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/DevonMSF DevonMSF

    Garcon. Very fast young player, bright future for the guy.