Cliff Lee Trade Another Example of Baseball’s Rich Getting Richer

I seek to preface this column by noting that baseball is by far my favorite sport. Despite the media narrative, I personally believe baseball is still America’s most popular sport and has fewer issues that need remedied than the other major sports. I have defended baseball to my friends on issues from steroids to competitive balance to many others for at least the past decade and a half. When folks say “Yankees/Red Sox/Mets/Phillies/Dodgers/Angels,” I reference the successes of the “Rays/Twins/Athletics/Indians” this decade.

I should also note — and those who know me would concur in a heartbeat — I am a fiscal conservative, a capitalist to the core who abhors socialism and redistribution of anything to those who have not earned it.

Cliff Lee Traded to Philadelphia PhilliesThat said, the trade deadline looms, and if you have not noticed, the “rich are getting richer.” On the flip side, year after year, my teams (Padres, Reds, Indians, Pirates) stink, and constantly lose prime players, while the teams in the major coastal cities — where my friends live — get better and keep winning.

One, a “suffering” Dodger fan, emailed me after the Phillies acquired Cliff Lee (reigning Cy Young winner, just like Sabathia was when Cleveland traded him last July):

“Dodgers need to get Halladay if they plan on going to the World Series.”

Well, we all want Roy Halladay, but only a few can even dream of this, sir. It must be nice to reside in your (baseball) world.

The Dodgers and Phils are surely the class of the NL, but what if they were unable to acquire the Manny Ramirezes and Raul Ibanezes of the world like 90% of baseball? (I should note these teams have also drafted sagaciously with respect to Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, Jimmy Rollins, Matt Kemp, Andre Ethier, James Loney et al.)

As I drove back through very late Monday night from Pads-Reds in Cincy, I had the same suggestion (of “cry me a river”), however, for the Red Sox, Yankees, Angels, Cubs, Phils, and a few others.

Truly now, what team has actually built a winner out of nothing the past decade?

Tampa Bay, Minnesota, and to some degree, Milwaukee, Colorado and Florida. Kudos to them. It can be done, but it’s tough. Everything must click and you must capitalize on all chances.

Joe Torre and Terry Francona (c.f. Phil Jackson in the NBA) need not worry about such ancillary matters. Brian C. and Theo E. will make sure of that. I’d like to see those two win in Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, San Diego, Washington, or Kansas City sometime, though.

{Addendum: The unions are major culprits in this “system” as well, but that’s been thoroughly documented for more than a quarter-century. As is too often the case with unions these days, their employees benefit while the profession and society (in this case, it’s paying customers) suffers. I don’t need to spell much more out, do I?}

* – Cliff Lee photo credit: Cleveland.com

Share This Article:


Email Article Email Article



About AJ Kaufman

AJ Kaufman is the co-editor of Midwest Sports Fans, where he has been a columnist since March 2009. AJ, a former Los Angeles schoolteacher and Indiana military historian, is now a corporate journalist, compiling publications for organizations across the country. He is a supporter of anything baseball-related -- especially minor league ball -- and mid-major college hoops. The author of three books, AJ is married to Maria and currently lives in Lincoln, Neb.

Follow him on Twitter (@ajkauf7) for ruminations on sports, politics, history and travel.

  • http://www.midwestsportsfans.com JRod

    Nice article AJ. I agree. It is true that there have been many examples of small market teams succeeded despite monetary limitations, but you are absolutely correct when you say that their margin for error is nil. Judging the success of GMs and managers in baseball is extremely tough because it’s like comparing apples to oranges in so many cases. Brian Cashman can make mistake after mistake, but the Yankees can keep winning because they can keep throwing money at the problem.

    I will say this though: it does make it more exciting when a small market team does get it right and can compete with the big boys.

  • http://www.i94sports.com rex jaybels

    It is the sad and unfortunate state of baseball. While I am a fan of a big market team, one that hasn’t done anything in quite some time, I live in a small market city and can see the effects it has on a fan base.

    The way the system is set up, if a team has money and can draft well, they will sit pretty for a good stretch. If they have money and can’t draft, they need to be really carefull with the decisions they make at the deadline or in the off-season. There is no east way to win in this league either way.

  • AJ

    “if a team has money and can draft well, they will sit pretty for a good stretch. If they have money and can’t draft, they need to be really carefull with the decisions they make at the deadline or in the off-season.”

    Well said. It can be done, and has. Some GMs are smarter and better-planned than others. But yes, the margin of error for the Yanks or Rede Sox is huge, and can be ameliorated on July 31, whereas others cannot.

  • Dils

    What about the fact that Cleveland gave up an underpaid ace pitcher for NONE of the Phillies top 4 prospects. Any team coud afford Cliff Lee, he is not expensive. And signed through next year. But only a team that has drafted well and has a STOCKED minor league system could get him via trade. And Shapiro should be ashamed of himself cutting that horrendous deal that did not net him Drabek, Happ, Brown or Taylor.

  • AJ

    Shapiro has destroyed the Indians. As a fan, I have noted this on this site.

    The Phils are now the Yanks and Red Sox though. Time for their “long suffering” fans to admit this. They’re buying titles.

    Without Lidge, they dont win last year. Howard, Rollins, Utley and a makeshift staff dont beat LA or TB

  • DLJ

    Yankees/Red Sox/Mets/Phillies/Dodgers/Angels

    Just remove “Phillies” from that list and you’re good to go.

    Before ’08 the Phils had only one championship in 125 years of existence. Not exactly a powerhouse franchise.

    True, the Phils are the most talented all-around team in the league…but in order to break Billy Penn’s curse, as you said, everything had to click, which it did, and they had to capitalize on all chances, which they did.

    Nothing in Philly sports comes easy.

  • AJ

    This is 2009 and the Phils are stacked. And they’ll keep buying players. No one wants to look back at your misery. Ask the Cubs, Indians, Padres, etc. Philly fans are still unhappy?

  • Hawaii Will

    AJ why do you sound so surprised? But small market teams can buy championships too. At least 1 year at a time. Look at the Marlins when they had that stacked team of Sheff, Daulton, Alou, Leiter, etc. in 1997 and won the WS against your Tribe — Marlins bought all these guys. This is also what happens in the NBA, the most recent example of buying a championship being the Celtics in 2008. You don’t follow it but that’s currently what Real Madrid is doing now – they are the Yankees of international football. It’s just a fact of life and as soon as you come to grips with it, you won’t be in such angst. But then you wouldn’t be writing blog posts like this one and we wouldn’t have a chance to respond. I’m not sure what I am getting at, but I need to get back to work now.

  • AJ

    True on AZ and 1997 FLA, but 2003 FLA, 2007 Colo and 2008 TB did not. As you can see from other comments, it’s not only about $ but near-perfect scouting, research, etc. And it’s very hard for “small market” teams to buy players these days.

  • PhilsChamps

    The Phils are only a big market team due to arbitration. How many big contracts do we have that did not come out of our farm club?? Are you insinuating that when our talent pays off we should trade them?? Why don’t you do a little research first. How many acquistions have we made that reach this level of trade? I’ll give you a little help so you don’t have to strain your brain…Rollins, Utley, Howard, Burrel (last year), and Hamels are all from our farm system. Victorino, Werth, Ibanez, etc..we’re all relatively low cost deals, that provided a big up-side. We Philly fans have been dieing for the time to come when we didn’t go cheap at the dealine. Last year, it was Blanton and Stairs…give me a break.

  • dennis

    Great article and all true.
    Look at the team the Padres have on the field now and look at the three winning pitchers from last 3 games!
    CAN YOU IMAGINE the big city teams putting a team out like that??

  • NateSta

    Dang, AJ.
    I was about to compliment you on a well written article, but your comment about the Phillies “buying” their championship ruined it. Lidge was acquired via trade for a player the Astros start in center (Bourne). He was then given an extension. Buying a player is when the Yankees outbid the Red Sox with a ridiculous offer for a free-agent. Ibanez was signed during the recession when NO ONE (Yanks excluded) was taking a chance on given big money for any free agent. Many teams could’ve signed him for the 3 years and 30+ mil, but were scared by the economy. Absolutely no one thought Ibanez would have a 1st season that would make the signing look like a bargain. Sure, it seems like the Phils fleeced the Indians for Lee since they didn’t have to give up the 4 players that the fans wanted to keep (Drabek, Happ, Taylor, and Brown), but they still had to trade the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 10th rated prospects in their farm system.

  • NateSta

    It is a shame how the union dictates free agency. Sabathia CLEARLY wanted to pitch in L.A. or Anahiem, but the union pressured him to take the biggest deal (Yankees) to inflate what the other free-agents could command.

  • AJ

    “I was about to compliment you on a well written article, but your comment about the Phillies “buying” their championship ruined it.”

    Of course it did. Seems Philly fans, despite a title and top team in ’09, still are insecure, sensitive and thin skinned. Relax.

    No, I don’t follow your team as closely as you do. Do you follow mine? Enough with the nitpicking. As Nate wisely noted, the article is valid and perhaps I glossed over some ancillary Philly info. Sue me. In addition to my full time job and personal life at home, I write half a dozen articles per week on various subject matters, for free, and cannot always be perfect.

    If you’re able to pontificate on any team other than you own to any degree, I’d be impressed. Please keep me posted.

    Until then, enjoy your free agents and homegrown talents, but also, stop using arrogant, petulant screen names like “PhilsChamps.” What, are you 12?

    Nate, great point about unions: the true culprits of America, now and sadly forever.

  • Quinty

    hahaha, wow AJ, way to tear “Philschamp” a new one…

    I think what “philschamp” fails to understand is the underlying point AJ was trying to make: that whereas the Phillies can give up their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rated prospects and not have to worry that they mortgaging their future, a team like, say, the Pirates, don’t have such a luxury. To a small market team, the prospects are the lifeblood of the organization and therefore, trading them away could be setting the franchise back years. Also realize that the bigger market teams have MUCH more money to pay for research and development of foreign born players (i.e. the Dominicans and Puerto Ricans). The Dodgers for instance, have a “baseball academy based out of the Dominican Republic where they find teenage kids with talent and spend years developing them before finally shipping the cream of the crop to their minor league system. This academy system is pretty standard for big market teams. I happen to be an Orioles fan and, shocker, there is no Dominican baseball academy for incoming Orioles players.

    Good article AJ, especially the point about the unions. It’s too bad that they are structured in the way that they are but I worry about the alternative as well:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=munson_lester&id=4336261

  • AJ

    exactly

    you made my point better than I could, and really, that’s all there is to it

    As a capitalist, i have no major issues with the system other than to say it is what it is…and Philly fan, whose city understandably has long been overrun by NY, Boston and DC — needs to understand their baseball team is now akin to the Yanks, Dodgers and Red Sox. They have big $ and they spend it. Nothing wrong with that, but dont chastise others for doing what you’re now doing. It leads to winning, after all.

  • NateSta

    @AJ,
    I’ll definitely agree to this: while the Phillies haven’t “bought” their WS rings, they are definitely paying for it. Buying out Rollins,’ Utley’s, Hamels,’ and Howard’s arbitration years. When you win a WS, you either reward your FA’s or let them walk. Many teams lose their role players to big FA deals, but the Phils resigned everyone (except a worthless Burrell). Now they are definitely in the upper payroll tier.
    AJ, you’re a good writer, but too sensitive. We Phillies fans aren’t attacking you as much as we are defending our beloved. Nothing is more offensive to a Philly fan than to be compared to a New York team or fan base.

  • http://www.realfakesports.blogspot.com Real Fake Sports

    I couldn’t agree more. Baseball is always “the rich get richer.”

    Cleveland Indians Front Office to Fans: “We Stopped Caring After We Traded Sabathia” (Satire)

  • http://www.realfakesports.blogspot.com Real Fake Sports

    I couldn’t agree more. Baseball is always “the rich get richer.”

    Cleveland Indians Front Office to Fans: “We Stopped Caring After We Traded Sabathia” (Satire)