<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Browns Should Go Defense, Not Michael Crabtree, With #5 Pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/04/browns-should-stay-away-from-michael-crabtree-with-5th-pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/04/browns-should-stay-away-from-michael-crabtree-with-5th-pick/</link>
	<description>A sports blog by and for Midwest Sports Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate Leach</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/04/browns-should-stay-away-from-michael-crabtree-with-5th-pick/#comment-6668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate Leach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=2282#comment-6668</guid>
		<description>ur a fool!  Michael Crabtree is an incredible player.  The Browns are terrible and you&#039;re trying to say they wouldn&#039;t be better off without Crabtree?  Please.  I bet the Browns wanted all that stuff to get out there about their &quot;bad visit&quot; with Crabtree because no one will trade up with them if they think the Browns want a WR.  Most teams know they can wait to get a WR.  But if teams think Cleve will choose Sanchez or a stud defensive player, they might be more apt to trade up. Like you said, it&#039;s all smoke screens and hearsay.  The Browns need a WR, Crabtree is the best one out there, and they&#039;ll pick him. I disagree with Kyle though.  I&#039;ve got no problem with you changing the article.  Might as well admit the mistake and correct it than let things hang out there you don&#039;t want to be.It&#039;s your site.  Do whatever the hell you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur a fool!  Michael Crabtree is an incredible player.  The Browns are terrible and you&#8217;re trying to say they wouldn&#8217;t be better off without Crabtree?  Please.  I bet the Browns wanted all that stuff to get out there about their &#8220;bad visit&#8221; with Crabtree because no one will trade up with them if they think the Browns want a WR.  Most teams know they can wait to get a WR.  But if teams think Cleve will choose Sanchez or a stud defensive player, they might be more apt to trade up. Like you said, it&#8217;s all smoke screens and hearsay.  The Browns need a WR, Crabtree is the best one out there, and they&#8217;ll pick him. I disagree with Kyle though.  I&#8217;ve got no problem with you changing the article.  Might as well admit the mistake and correct it than let things hang out there you don&#8217;t want to be.It&#8217;s your site.  Do whatever the hell you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRod</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/04/browns-should-stay-away-from-michael-crabtree-with-5th-pick/#comment-6667</link>
		<dc:creator>JRod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=2282#comment-6667</guid>
		<description>@Kyle, thanks for the comment.  Couple things:

1 - You&#039;re right.  I shouldn&#039;t have published it without being sure of what I wanted to say.  But I&#039;d rather make that mistake than float any more stuff out there that proves to be false later, as happened when I posted the story about Raji, Cushing, et al failing drug tests at the Combine.  Bloggers get a bad rap for not being credible, and while I don&#039;t think commenting on already established rumors is necessarily an inherently bad thing, I was pretty harsh on Crabtree based on hearsay rumors from unnnamed sources and I just didn&#039;t think I was fair.  Just because I hit the publish button doesn&#039;t mean, in my opinion, that I should leave attacks on someone&#039;s character out there.  Regardless of the validity of the rumors on which the attacks were based, I was wrong.  So I changed it.

2 - As to the rumors about Crabtree and the Browns, I have purposely not commented much on the NFL draft because so much of what you read this time of year is disinformation, hearsay, and smoke screens.  I should have stuck with my guns.  Those rumors are out there, but the Browns could also still take Crabtree at #5.  So who the hell knows.  I&#039;m done trying to figure it out and just waiting until Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kyle, thanks for the comment.  Couple things:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; You&#8217;re right.  I shouldn&#8217;t have published it without being sure of what I wanted to say.  But I&#8217;d rather make that mistake than float any more stuff out there that proves to be false later, as happened when I posted the story about Raji, Cushing, et al failing drug tests at the Combine.  Bloggers get a bad rap for not being credible, and while I don&#8217;t think commenting on already established rumors is necessarily an inherently bad thing, I was pretty harsh on Crabtree based on hearsay rumors from unnnamed sources and I just didn&#8217;t think I was fair.  Just because I hit the publish button doesn&#8217;t mean, in my opinion, that I should leave attacks on someone&#8217;s character out there.  Regardless of the validity of the rumors on which the attacks were based, I was wrong.  So I changed it.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; As to the rumors about Crabtree and the Browns, I have purposely not commented much on the NFL draft because so much of what you read this time of year is disinformation, hearsay, and smoke screens.  I should have stuck with my guns.  Those rumors are out there, but the Browns could also still take Crabtree at #5.  So who the hell knows.  I&#8217;m done trying to figure it out and just waiting until Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/04/browns-should-stay-away-from-michael-crabtree-with-5th-pick/#comment-6666</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=2282#comment-6666</guid>
		<description>maybe you should actually figure out what you want to say before publishing your article then.  not sure what was wrong with the original piece.  the rumors about the browns and crabtre being at odds are all out there anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you should actually figure out what you want to say before publishing your article then.  not sure what was wrong with the original piece.  the rumors about the browns and crabtre being at odds are all out there anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 528/532 objects using apc

Served from: midwestsportsfans.com @ 2012-02-12 17:58:32 -->
