MMA Roundup: UFC 96 Preview, UFC 98 Mir-Lesnar Bout Canceled

Email Post Email Post

UFC 96 Preview, Odds, PredictionsWhile UFC 96 is a mere hours away, the big news surrounds May’s UFC 98. It has been reported that the Frank Mir v Brock Lesnar Heavyweight Title unification bout has been canceled. There are conflicting reports of a knee or back injury. (Update: See comment section for update.) Either way it is Frank Mir who has to pull out of this fight. It’s unclear weither UFC officials will replace Mir or if Brock will be pulled completely off the card.

As mentioned above, this match was to unify the Heavyweight title Lesnar had won from Randy “The Natural” Coture at UFC 91 last November, and the Interm Heavyweight Title Mir won from Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira in December at UFC 92. Mir’s upset victory not only garnered him that interim title, but it added heat to the unification bout since he defeated Lesnar in the first round of his UFC debut.

Now to more immediate info.

UFC 96 is live this Saturday on PPV. As has been my duty in the past, I’m going to give you a look into the money lines, the backgrounds, and my feelings on a few of the fights. First lets his the specifics:

UFC 96 Live on Pay-Per-View, Saturday March 7th, 10pm est. All lines courtesy of BetUs.com.

Quintin “Rampage” Jackson (-350) v Keith “The Dean of Mean” Jardine (+250)

The top fight on this event will see one of my all time favorites take on one of the ugliest men in the business. Rampage has been up and down over the last year. He lost the Light-Heavy title to Forrest Griffin, decided to stop eating and sleeping for a week, went for a highly publicized drive that resulted in injuries and damages to other people and their cars, fired his trainer, and joined a new camp in England. After all of that he still found it in him to turn out the lights on Wanderlei Silva and win the Knockout of the Night award back at UFC 92 in December. It’s rumored if Rampage wins, his next fight will be to reclaim the Light-Heavy title against a surging Rashad Evans.

Rampage Jackson v Keith Jardine - UFC 96

There isn’t a lot of nice things I have to say about Keith Jardine. He has never wronged me personally and I haven’t met him. As a fighter I just don’t like him.

He is a guy who fights up to the talent level of whoever he’s fighting. That tells me he is lazy. He’s beaten both Forrest Griffin and Chuck Liddell, but during this span he has also lost to a failing Wanderlei Silva (who placed one hand on Keith’s neck and used the other to punch him ugly) and a worthless Houston Alexander.

What I am saying is Keith wins fights he should lose and loses fights he should win. His best bet at beating Rampage is by using leg kicks and hoping he can cause the same type damage Forrest Griffin did against Jackson.

My Pick: Rampage via KO in the First.

Gabriel “Napo” Gonzaga (-160) V. Shane Carwin (+130)

This is a fight I want to watch. I have no idea what is going to happen in it, but we have one guy in Gonzaga who has the ability to have really fun bouts, and we have a guy in Carwin who is something of an up and comer. Gonzaga has a two-fight win streak going, and both have been dominate. That being said Fabrico Wedum and Randy Couture both TKO’ed him not that long ago.

Shane Carwin is someone I don’t know much about. I have watched his fights without ever really remembering him, of course that probably speaks more to my alcohol consumption then to his memorability. What I have learned about Carwin is that he is a wrestler by nature and he looks like he belongs in the WWE. Most importantly, he has never had to go out of the first round to get a win.

I don’t see it being out of the realm of reasonability that, with Mir out, this becomes a #1 contenders match. Whoever wins gets a shot at Lesnar at 98? I know it’s a bit of a stretch, but it would help the UFC add some last minute heat to a PPV which is seriously lacking buzz.

Just for you the reader, as I was finishing this article I happened across an interview with both Gonzaga and Carwin. It is because of this interview I am changing my prediction:

My Pick: Gonzaga via armbar in the second

Outside of these two fights, there isn’t a whole lot for me to add to this prediction. The actual PPV card is a bit weak for the UFC. Sure the Pete Sell Vs. Matt Brown match could turn into a slug fest, but neither man will turn into a title contender by winning. I am personally hoping to see Matt “The Hammer” Hamill drop to the new comer Mark Muno, but that is solely based on the fact Muno trains with Urijah Faber.UFC 96 Preview and Predictions and Money Lines

What is probably the most interesting fight on this card is the Brandon Vera v Michael Patt. It’s not interesting because of the matchup, but because Vera is within one loss of becoming a sports cautionary tale. He spent a year in a contract holdout to make huge money, pissed people off, got what he wanted, came back and hasn’t been impressive at all since. If Vira looses this fight, he will have gone from main event-caliber name to a pink slip in less then a year. After having watched the fighters weigh in, Patt looks like the town drunk, but Vera looked like he was already beaten. I wont be suprised if this goes to a decision or if Vera looses via TKO.



LOTD: Newly Sponsored Basketball-Reference.com Calbert Cheaney Page

Email Post Email Post

While taking a prolonged lunch break and procastinating at work, I stumbled upon Bill Simmons’ most recent mailbag.

Nearly an hour later, here I am — still procrastinating.

Anyway, in the latest Bill Simmons mailbag a reader tells him about a feature at Basketball-Reference.com in which you can sponsor player pages and suggests that Simmons sponsor the Mike DunleavCalbert Cheaneyy page. Simmons, of course, proceeds to do so. Follow the link to view Simmons’ sponsorship of the Mike Dunleavy Basketball-Referene.com page.

If you don’t feel like clicking on a link, it says: “I wasted tens of thousands of dollars on Clippers tickets from 2004-2009 thanks to Dunleavy, only one of the most dreadful coach/GM’s in NBA history. What’s another 10 dollars?”

Well, it didn’t take me but two seconds to realize I needed to sign up and sponsor the page for my favorite basketball player of all time: Calbert Cheaney. I’ve made my love for Calbert Cheaney known many times on this site, so no need to belabor to the point any more in this post. However, I will direct your attention to the newly sponsored Calbert Cheaney page on Basketball-Reference.com with today’s Link of the Day:

LOTD: Calbert Cheaney Player Page — (Basketball-Reference.com)

Note: I just realized there is about a 24-hour delay between when you sign up to sponsor and when it actually shows up on their page. But screw it, I’ve already written this post out so I’m publishing anyway.

Anyway, I encourage you all to wisely invest $15 like I did to sponsor the page of your favorite player — or do what Simmons did and sponsor the page of someone you despise.  Leave a link to your sponsored page in the comments for all to enjoy.

Now some more links for your Friday afternoon pleasure:

NFL Draft Preview: Are the Browns Tipping Their Hat with Jeremy Maclin? — (Waiting for Next Year)

Manny: Worth Every Penny — (Josh Q. Public)

Stan Van Gundy needs to shut up — (Sparty and Friends)

Paxson grows some, but is it a good thing? — (Pippen Ain’t Easy)

Random Retro Baseball Player: Claudell Washington — (Sharapova’s Thigh)

LeBron’s “Pimp Focus” is still going strong — (Black Sports Online)



Cavs-Celtics Preview: Battle for Eastern Conference Supremacy

Email Post Email Post

Cleveland Cavaliers - Boston Celtics PreviewThe Cavaliers are in Boston tonight, one game up in the quest for Eastern Conference supremacy, with the head-to-head tiebreaker over the Celtics on the line (the season series is currently 1-1).

It’s a big one tonight.

If the Cavaliers win, it is going to go a long way towards securing home court advantage in the playoffs. But even if they lose, I’ll take my chances come playoff time if this year’s version of the Celtics match up with this year’s version of the Cavaliers again for an Eastern Conference Finals repeat.

If you go back to the Game 7 that Cleveland lost in Boston last year, by five points, there is no way that you can look at these two teams and not say that Cleveland got extremely better, and Boston – at best – stayed the same.

From a roster standpoint, the Cavaliers have subtracted Damon Jones and Devin Brown from last year’s playoff squad. In return they added Mo Williams and J.J. Hickson. The Celtics, on the other hand, subtracted James Posey, and added Stephon Marbury – huh? – and Mikki Moore – who hasn’t seemed to be able to score a basket since Jason Kidd left him having to create a shot for himself – and I can’t see how that math makes Boston better.

Mo Williams alone makes your team six points better on an off night, no?

If you ask me, Danny Ainge has been smoking all of Red Auerbach’s cigars since hoisting the trophy last year. The East is Cleveland’s for the taking and tonight will go a long way in deciding that.

Mo Williams photo courtesy of AP Photo/Tony Dejak

———-
Custom Cornhole Boards and Accessories JD Shaver is a featured columnist at Midwest Sports Fans who also runs Shaver Sports, where they discuss everything you ever wanted to know about Cleveland sports.

JD Shaver’s contributions to Midwest Sports Fans are sponsored by BigTimeGameBoards.com, the company that helps you tailgate like a champion with our high quality cornhole boards, sets and accessories. And if you don’t know what cornhole is, you aren’t a Midwesterner.



College Basketball: SEC Tournament Preview and History

Email Post Email Post

2009 SEC Mens Basketball Tournament Preview: TV Schedule, History, ChampionsThere is one primary reason why I enjoy the SEC Tournament: it gives me another opportunity to root against Kentucky.

It’s nothing personal against the Wildcats really, it just comes with the territory of growing up in Bloomington as an Indiana fan. When you grow up cheering for the Cream & Crimson you are indoctrinated early into hating Purdue and Kentucky in pretty much equal amounts.

So I guess when you look at it that way, it is personal against the Wildcats. Oh well.

Luckily, what appeared to be a Kentucky resurgence earlier this year has been derailed, as the Wildcats have lost in three in a row as of this post. They currently sit in a tie for 3rd in the SEC East division with Florida at 8-7. Something tells me that Kentucky will make it to the NCAA Tournament, barring a complete collapse over their final few games, but a run in the SEC Tournament next week certainly would not hurt.

Here is a quick preview of the 2009 SEC Mens Basketball Tournament:


Buy NCAA Basketball Tickets at RazorGator

And, as is our custom here at MSF with these conference tournament previews, here is a breakdown of the daily schedule and TV listings:


2009 SEC Tournament TV Schedule and Matchups

Game Date Matchup Time TV
1 Thu, March 12 E4 Kentucky def. W5 Ole Miss 71-58 1:00 ET RAYCOM
2 Thu, March 12 W3 Mississippi State def. E6 Georgia 79-60 3:15 ET RAYCOM
3 Thu, March 12 W4 Alabama def. E5 Vanderbilt 82-75 7:30 ET RAYCOM
4 Thu, March 12 E3 Florida def. W6 Arkansas 73-58 9:45 ET RAYCOM
         
5 Fri, March 13 W1 LSU def. E4 Kentucky 67-58 1:00 ET RAYCOM
6 Fri, March 13 W3 Mississippi State def. E2 South Carolina 82-68 3:15 ET RAYCOM
7 Fri, March 13 E1 Tennessee def. W4 Alabama 86-62 7:30 ET RAYCOM
8 Fri, March 13 W2 Auburn def. E3 Florida 61-58 9:45 ET RAYCOM
         
9 Sat, March 14 W3 Mississippi State def. W1 LSU 67-57 1:00 ET RAYCOM
10 Sat, March 14 E1 Tennessee def. W2 Auburn 94-85 3:15 ET RAYCOM
         
11 Sun, March 15 W3 Mississippi State def. E1 Tennessee 64-61 1:00 ET CBS

Last season showed us how much the seeds mean in the SEC Tournament. Georgia was 4-12 in the regular season, tied for the worst record in the SEC; they went on to win the SEC Tournament and earn a berth in the NCAA Tournament.

Who could be this year’s Georgia? Well, how about Georgia?

They are 3-12 this season, which actually is not the worst record in the SEC. Arkansas currrently sits with a putrid 2-13 record in the conference play. Wow, what a terrible record. I don’t even know their fans can still root for them! (Irony alert: Remember, I’m and IU fan. Yes, I remember that we’ve only won 1 game in conference play this year. Maybe we can pull a Georgia and become the most unlikely NCAA Tournament participant ever!)

Anyway, that’s enough rambling from me. You’re here for specific information, and if you didn’t get it from the schedule above, here is a breakdown of the SEC Mens Basketball Tournament history, with past champions and MVP winners:



SEC Mens Basketball Tournament History: Champions and MVPs

Year SEC Tournament Champion Site SEC Tournament MVP
1933 Kentucky Wildcats Atlanta, GA  
1934 Alabama Crimson Tide Atlanta, GA  
  No Tournament    
1936 Tennessee Volunteers Knoxville, TN  
1937 Kentucky Wildcats Knoxville, TN*  
1938 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Baton Rouge, LA  
1939 Kentucky Wildcats Knoxville, TN  
1940 Kentucky Wildcats Knoxville, TN  
1941 Tennessee Volunteers Louisville, KY  
1942 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1943 Tennessee Volunteers Louisville, KY  
1944 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1945 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1946 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1947 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1948 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1949 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1950 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1951 Vanderbilt Commodores Louisville, KY  
1952 Kentucky Wildcats Louisville, KY  
1953-78 No Tournament    
1979 Tennessee Volunteers Birmingham, AL Kyle Macy, Kentucky
1980 LSU Tigers Birmingham, AL DeWayne Scales, LSU
1981 Ole Miss Rebels Birmingham, AL Dominique Wilkins, Georgia
1982 Alabama Crimson Tide Lexington, KY Dirk Minniefield, Kentucky
1983 Georgia Bulldogs Birmingham, AL Vern Fleming, Georgia
1984 Kentucky Wildcats Nashville, TN Charles Barkely, Auburn
1985 Auburn Tigers Birmingham, AL Chuck Person, Auburn
1986 Kentucky Wildcats Lexington, KY John Williams, LSU
1987 Alabama Crimson Tide Atlanta, GA Derrick McKey, Alabama
1988 Kentucky Wildcats* Baton Rouge, LA Rex Chapman, Kentucky
1989 Alabama Crimson Tide Knoxville, TN Livingston Chatman, Florida
1990 Alabama Crimson Tide Orlando, FL Melvin Cheatum, Alabama
1991 Alabama Crimson Tide Nashville, TN Allan Houston, Tennessee
1992 Kentucky Wildcats Birmingham, AL Jamal Mashburn, Kentucky
1993 Kentucky Wildcats Lexington, KY Travis Ford, Kentucky
1994 Kentucky Wildcats Memphis, TN Travis Ford, Kentucky
1995 Kentucky Wildcats Atlanta, GA Antoine Walker, Kentucky
1996 Mississippi State Bulldogs New Orleans, LA Dontae' Jones, Mississippi State
1997 Kentucky Wildcats Memphis, TN Ron Mercer, Kentucky
1998 Kentucky Wildcats Atlanta, GA Wayne Turner, Kentucky
1999 Kentucky Wildcats Atlanta, GA Scott Padgett, Kentucky
2000 Arkansas Razorbacks Atlanta, GA Brandon Dean, Arkansas
2001 Kentucky Wildcats Nashville, TN Tayshaun Price, Kentucky
2002 Mississippi State Bulldogs Atlanta, GA Mario Austin, Mississippi State
2003 Kentucky Wildcats New Orleans, LA Keith Bogans, Kentucky
2004 Kentucky Wildcats Atlanta, GA Gerald Fitch, Kentucky
2005 Florida Gators Atlanta, GA Matt Walsh, Florida
2006 Florida Gators Nashville, TN Taurean Green, Florida
2007 Florida Gators Atlanta, GA Al Horford, Florida
2008 Georgia Bulldogs Atlanta, GA Sundiata Gaines, Georgia
2009 Mississippi State Bulldogs St. Pete, FL Jarvis Varnado, Mississippi State
2010 Kentucky Wildcats Nashville, TN John Wall, Kentucky
2011 Kentucky Wildcast Atlanta, GA Darius Miller, Kentucky
  * - Later vacated after Eddie Sutton scandal   Note: The MVP award was not awarded until 1979

As you can see, and no doubt expected, Kentucky has been pretty successful over the years in the SEC Tournament. Can they do it again this year? It might take more superhuman efforts from Jodie Meeks, but if Georgia could win it last year then anything is possble come SEC Tournament time.

And if you want information about the other conference tournaments (minus the PAC 10 because, well, I just haven’t gotten around to them yet), here you go:



College Basketball: Big East Tournament Preview and History

Email Post Email Post

2009 Big East Tournament Schedule, Bracket, TV, Tickets, History, Past ChampionsA few weeks back we published our 2009 Big Ten Conference Mens Basketball Tournament Preview, which included a look at the past champions for young tournament. Last we took a look at the 2009 ACC Conference Mens Basketball Tournament and its longer and much more storied history.

Today, we are taking a look at the 2009 Big East Conference Mens Basketball Tournament, as well as the tournament history. This year, the Big East Tournament will feature all 16 teams in the conference for the first time. And with 2009 stalwarts like UCONN, Louisville, and Pitt at the top of the class, plus teams like Notre Dame, Cincinnati, and Georgetown hoping to make enough noise to earn a bid to the 2009 NCAA Tournament, the 2009 Big East Tournament should be the most exciting of them all.

Here is your quick preview of the 2009 Big East Tournament:

Buy NCAA Basketball Tickets at RazorGator

This year’s Big East Tournament actually spans the entire week, beginning on Tuesday with the first round games and then lasting all the way until Saturday night’s championship game. Below, you fill find the daily schedule for the 2009 Big East Tournament. You can also follow the link to get a printable 2009 Big East Tournament bracket.


2009 Big East Tournament Matchups and TV Schedule

Game Date Matchup Time TV
1 Tues, March 10 #16 DePaul def. #9 Cincinnati 67-57 12:00 ET BIGEAST.tv
2 Tues, March 10 #13 St. John's def. #12 Georgetown 64-59 2:00 ET BIGEAST.tv
3 Tues, March 10 #10 Notre Dame def. #15 Rutgers 61-50 7:00 ET BIGEAST.tv
4 Tues, March 10 #11 Seton Hall def. #14 USF 68-54 9:00 ET BIGEAST.tv
         
5 Wed, March 11 #8 Providence def #16 DePaul 83-74 12:00 ET ESPN
6 Wed, March 11 #5 Marquette def. #13 St. John's 74-45 2:00 ET ESPN
7 Wed, March 11 #7 West Virginia def. #10 Notre Dame 74-62 7:00 ET ESPN
8 Wed, March 11 #6 Syracuse def. #11 Seton Hall 89-74 9:00 ET ESPN
         
9 Thu, March 12 #1 Louisville def. #8 Providence 73-55 12:00 ET ESPN
10 Thu, March 12 #4 Villanova def. #5 Marquette 76-75 2:00 ET ESPN
11 Thu, March 12 #7 West Virginia def. #2 Pittsburgh 74-60 7:00 ET ESPN
12 Thu, March 12 #6 Syracuse def. #3 UConn 127-177* 9:00 ET ESPN
    *6 overtime periods    
13 Fri, March 13 #1 Louisville def. #4 Villanova 69-55 7:00 ET ESPN
14 Fri, March 13 #6 Syracuse def. #7 West Virginia 74-69 9:00 ET ESPN
         
15 Sat, March 14 #1 Louisville v #6 Syracuse 9:00 ET ESPN

Go to the official Big East Conference Mens Basketball website and look to the right sidebar to get the updated standings if you want to know who is currently seeded where. The Big East tournament always seems to be one of the most exciting and dramatic conference tournaments each year. Some team always seems to come out of nowhere (like the Gerry McNamara-led Orangemen from a few years ago, for example) to compete for a title, and there are often #1 seeds and NCAA Tournament bubble berths on the line.

This year is no different.

In fact, UCONN, PITT, and Louisville all have pretty legitimate claims to #1 seeds this season. Based on what happens in the Big East tournament, and in the rest of the games around the country still to be played before Selection Sunday, we could see three #1 seeds from the Big East. They almost certainly will get two. Let’s take a quick trip down memory lane and look at the history of the Big East Tournament, including past champions and MVPs.



Big East Tournament History: Past Champions and MVPs

Date Big East Champion Score Runner-Up MVP
1980 Georgetown 87-81 Syracuse Craig Shelton, Georgetown
1981 Syracuse 83-80* Villanova Leo Rautins, Syracuse
1982 Georgetown 72-54 Villanova Eric Floyd, Georgetown
1983 St. John's 85-77 Boston College Chris Mullin, St. John's
1984 Georgetown 82-71* Syracuse Patrick Ewing, Georgetown
1985 Georgetown 92-80 St. John's Patrick Ewing, Georgetown
1986 St. John's 70-69 Syracuse Dwayne Washington, Syracuse
1987 Georgetown 69-59 Syracuse Reggie Williams, Georgetown
1988 Syracuse 85-68 Villanova Sherman Douglas, Syracuse
1989 Georgetown 88-79 Syracuse Charles Smith, Georgetown
1990 Connecticut 78-65 Syracuse Chris Smith, UCONN
1991 Seton Hall 74-62 Georgetown Oliver Taylor, Seton Hall
1992 Syracuse 56-54 Georgetown Alonzo Mourning, Georgetown
1993 Seton Hall 103-70 Syracuse Terry Dehere, Seton Hall
1994 Providence 74-64 Georgetown Michael Smith, Providence
1995 Villanova 94-78 Connecticut Kerry Kittles, Villanova
1996 Connecticut 75-74 Georgetown Victor Page, Georgetown
1997 Boston College 70-58 Villanova Scoonie Penn, Boston College
1998 Connecticut 69-64 Syracuse Khalid El-Amin, UCONN
1999 Connecticut 82-63 St. John's Kevin Freeman, UCONN
2000 St. John's 80-70 Connecticut Bootsy Thonton, St. John's
2001 Boston College 79-57 Pittsburgh Troy Bell, Boston College
2002 Connecticut 74-65* Pittsburgh Caron Butler, UCONN
2003 Pittsburgh 74-56 Connecticut Julius Page, Pittsburgh
2004 Connecticut 61-58 Pittsburgh Ben Gordon, UCONN
2005 Syracuse 68-59 West Virginia Hakim Warrick, Syracuse
2006 Syracuse 65-61 Pittsburgh Gerry McNamara, Syracuse
2007 Georgeton 65-42 Pittsburgh Jeff Green, Georgetown
2008 Pittsburgh 74-65 Georgetown Sam Young, Pittsburgh
2009 Louisville 76-66 Syracuse Jonny Flynn, Syracuse
2010 West Virginia 60-58 Georgetown Da'Sean Butler, WVU
2011 Connecticut 69-66 Louisville Kemba Walker, UCONN

Note: Every Big East Tournament since 1983 has been played at the site of this year’s tournament, Madison Square Garden in New York. The other venues were:

  • 1980: Providence Civic Center – Providence, RI
  • 1981: Carrier Dome – Syracuse, NY
  • 1982: Hartford Civic Center – Hartford, CTBig East Conference Tournament Preview - Schedule, Bracket, History

From a Midwest perspective (since we are Midwest Sports Fans after all), this year’s Big East Tournament is huge for Notre Dame. As I write this, the Fighting Irish are 7-10 in the conference, 16-13 overall, and clinging to their last slim hope of an NCAA Tournament bid despite another outstanding season from Luke Harangody. I’ve heard a lot of the college basketball talking heads predicting the Irish as a dark horse for this year’s Big East Tournament. If they can shoot well, it certainly is not outside the realm of possibility. However, they will have to win games on five consecutive days to make it a reality.

Maybe they can do it, but I wouldn’t hold your breath.

As for Louisville and Marquette, they can obviously improve their NCAA Tournament seeding with a good showing. However, going deep into the tournament does have its drawbacks, as playing 3 or 4 days in a row right before the NCAA tournament could create some fatigue late in the season. I heard some of the ESPN analysts discussing this last night. The way I see it though, the tournament ends on Saturday and the first NCAA tourney game would not be until the next Thursday. That should be plenty of time to rest up for any team that has play 3, 4, or even 5 games to win the Big East Tournament title.

Either way, it is going to be a great week of basketball in the Big East and around the country. Enjoy the games, and get ready for one of the most glorious days of the year: Selection Sunday, now less than two weeks away!



College Basketball Picks For This Weekend’s Big Games

Email Post Email Post

UCONN-Pitt, Louisville-WVU, UNC-Duke PicksSorry Big Ten fans, but the hot actions this weekend is in the Big East and ACC, where both conference’s regular-season crowns are up for grabs.

March Madness betting players have been looking at teams from the ACC and Big East all season, and the top four sportsbook favorites come from those conferences. The regular season wraps up this weekend, beginning with a pair of battles in the Big East on Saturday followed by college basketball’s hottest rivalry on Sunday.

Connecticut vs Pittsburgh odds – Saturday, March 7, 12:00 PM ET

The top-ranked Huskies will aim to avenge a 76-68 home loss to the No.3 Panthers on Feb. 16. The Huskies have to find a way to slow down DeJuan Blair, who lit them up for 22 points and 23 boards in his meeting with UConn center Hasheem Thabeet. The Huskies are 10-0 on the road this year, while the Panthers should be online betting favorites as they are 18-0 at home. Something has to give in what will be a bruising matchup between these March Madness betting favorites.

Online betting pick: Pittsburgh

Louisville vs West Virginia odds – Saturday, March 7, 9:00 PM ET

The No.6 Cardinals will be anxiously watching the UConn-Pitt game, as a Pitt win would put those teams at 15-3 in the Big East. Louisville is 15-2, and a win could possibly earn them a share of the regular-season title. The Cardinals beat the Mountaineers 69-63 at home on Jan. 31, but West Virginia didn’t go down easily, almost overturning a 21-point halftime deficit on the road. The Mountaineers have lost only to Pitt and UConn at home, but a win over the Cardinals would open a lot of eyes. The NCAA basketball betting lines for this game should be very close in either direction.

Online betting pick: West Virginia

Duke vs North Carolina odds – Sunday, March 8, 4:00 PM ET

The No.7 Blue Devils can send the ACC regular-season title to a tiebreaker if they beat the No.2 Tar Heels, but a win is imperative since UNC went to Duke on Feb. 11 and ran all over the Blue Devils. Ty Lawson scored 21 of his 25 points in the second half and the Blue Devils don’t appear to have anyone to stop him from getting in the lane. The Blue Devils also went cold from long distance, going 8-of-24. While Duke will be sportsbook underdogs on the road this weekend, they shouldn’t be afraid of heading to UNC. The Blue Devils have won three of their last five trips to the “Dean Dome”, named after legendary Carolina coach Dean Smith. The Tar Heels will still be March Madness betting favorites with a loss, but beating Duke is always good.

Online betting pick: North Carolina



The Story of Clay Matthews: Inspiring Others to Chase Their Dreams of a College Football Scholarship

Email Post Email Post

college football scholarships

We are taking a quick break today from our usual daily M.O. of Midwest sports news, rumors, entertainment, links and humor to talk about dreams.

Don’t worry, we are not straying too far off-topic, as you will see in a second. But let me just preface this post by saying that if you are a high school football player, or the parent of a current or future high school football player, you may just want to go ahead and bookmark this page right now.

Because this post was written for you.

It begins with the story of one former high football school player who achieved his college football scholarship dreams, and ends with my own personal recommendation for the best resource I’ve ever found for helping you or your high school football player achieve similar dreams of college football scholarships as well.

———-

Come April 25th, when the 1st round of the NFL Draft turns into the 2nd round, there is a familiar name that Cleveland Browns fans are hoping is still available: Clay Matthews. And as all Browns fans and most college football fans know, yes I am talking about the son of that Clay Matthews.

The entire city of Cleveland might erupt with excitement if the son of the legendary Browns linebacker is available with the 36th overall selection. The younger Matthews is not quite good enough to be a possibility for the Browns’ 5th oClay Matthews III - 2009 NFL Draft Prospect USCverall selection, but probably too good to last that far in the 2nd round. I scoured the most recent mock drafts and the lowest I saw Clay Matthews being taken was 33rd overall by the Lions.

The fact that the second round NFL Draft availability of Clay Matthews is even a question mark is a tremendous testament to the incredible story of the former USC walk-on turned probable 1st Round pick.

Background:

As a high school junior, Clay Matthews III (he grandfather was an NFL player as well) was a 166-pound backup linebacker at Agoura High in California. He ultimately started as a senior, but only received one scholarship offer from a Division I program: Idaho. Matthews, however, was determined to play football at his father’s alma mater, and decided to forego the Idaho offer and walk-on at USC. Pete Carroll accepted Matthews into the storied Trojan program, in large part because of his name and work ethic, but with no expectation that the skinny, undersized kid would ever be able to match up physically with the top talent in Division I college football.

Success:

Clay Matthews earned his keep on special teams, eventually earning a college football scholarship and twice being named USC’s co-Special Teams Player of the Year. As a junior, he was a backup linebacker, and this year became a starter and ultimately was named Second Team All Pac 10.

Lesson:

There is no telling what can be accomplished by someone with the heart, will, and desire to follow their dreams; and, it doesn’t hurt to have a prestigious family name and legacy to help open a door of opportunity every now and again.

That last part is in no way meant as a knock against Clay Matthews. Had he gone to Idaho, his will to be great very well might have driven him to become the exact same player that he is today.

However, doing what he did at USC, with the help of the family name that got his foot in the door, no doubt allowed him to maximize his potential by going up against the best of the best every day in practice. And it is reasonable to assume that if he was “Clay Matthews, linebacker, Idaho” as opposed to “Clay Matthews, linebacker, USC” that he may not be projected as quite as high of a draft pick as he is with the cache of the USC brand behind him.

So while the story of Clay Matthews is one that any aspiring, but undersized or underexposed, high school football player can draw inspiration from, the vast majority of them do not have a name that, by itself, will warrant attention and opportunity. But like Clay Matthews III, they may have an intense desire to become a scholarship college football player, and just in need of an opportunity to showcase their abilities and will to succeed.

How to Get Recruited for College Football Scholarships

The story of Clay Matthews got me to thinking about what resources are out there that can help high school players fulfill their dreams of getting recruited and earning college football scholarships.

I grew up in a football family with a dad who was a Division I college football coach. I know about the inordinate amount of time he spent recruiting, and thus the time spent sifting through the lists and tapes of potential prospects to zero in on the ones he would ultimately target. I wondered how the growth of the Internet, among other changes over the past decade, has altered the college football recruiting landscape.

My dad is out of coaching now, and has been for the better part of this decade. Yet, as he and I both expected, there are a wealth of websites, books, and other resources that purport to show aspiring college football players how to get recruited with tips and tricks for getting exposed and making their college football scholarship dreams come true. Most of these websites seemed to be pretty much a dime-a-dozen to me, but I did find one in particular that stood out: Play College Football.

Play College Football: College Football Scholarship and Recruiting Resource

As opposed to just being a run-of-the-mill “how to get recruited for college football” website, Play College Football is actually an eBook that is a comprehensive resource for high school football players and theirPlay College Football: how to get recruited for college football scholarships families to use for efficiently gaining the right kind of exposure.

We all know that college football recruiting is an inexact science, and college football coaches know this as well. Most schools and coaches use recruiting services to highlight the players they should be targeting at different positions and in different areas of the country. But we have all heard stories like that of Clay Matthews, and most college football coaches realize that a little extra digging and an open mind can sometimes lead to the unearthing of a diamond-in-the-rough talent who can someday contribute to wins on the football field and, in turn, to said coach keeping his job or moving up the ranks.

This is what makes Play College Football the best resource I found: it provides a wealth of relevant information, along with detailed and systematic guidelines that that teach high school football players how to get recruited and gain exposure.

Obviously, making initial contact with a coach or getting game tape seen is only the first step, and the story told by the tape will go a long way towards determining if a coach will follow up; but as they say: “the journey of a thousand steps begins with a single stride.” Play College Football gives you everything to take not just that difficult first “single stride”, but to take every step necessary to leave no stone unturned in your quest to become a college football player.

Here are a few highlights of specific features in the book that help you learn how to get recruited to play college football:

  • The book’s author, Tom Faulkner, is the father of a player who received a scholarship at a “nationally ranked D1 FBS team to play football.”

I actually spoke with Mr. Faulkner to get a little more background about the book once I found about it, and he said that the book is simply his way of communicating to other parents of high school football players the steps that he and his family took to help his son get recruited and achieve his dream of a college football scholarship.

His son, he told me, was immensely talented but, for a variety of reasons, fell under the radar as a recruit. By being proactive about initiating the right kind of contact through the right kind of channels, Mr. Faulkner and his son were able to let his son’s abilities and production as a high school quarterback communicate his potential value at the next level.

The rest is history and his son became a scholarship player at a DI school.

Other features include:

  • Play College Football provides a “College Assessment Chart” that allows players and their families to effectively assess what schools would be the right fit in terms of both scholarships and potential playing time based on roster composition. This is where the efficiency comes in, as college football scholarships are most effectively sought when you target schools for whom you or your soon will fill a specific need.
  • As I learned from my dad, making sure that you communicate with the right coach is immensely important. Contacting head coaches, who have so many responsibilities and obligations, can often be met with silence and is not a great way to get recruited if are an “off the radar screen” type player. However, contacting position coaches, or the coach who recruits your area, offers a far greater potential for a response and the opening of a dialogue. Play College Football provides the contact information position coaches at every D1, D2, and NAIA school.
  • In general, Play College Football was designed to save families time. Mr. Faulkner explained in detail the arduous process of looking up contact information, as well as general school and roster information, as they executed the plan for their son. One of the goals in writing the book, he said, was to teach players and their parents how to get recruited while saving valuable time. Hence, the plethora of links, forms, charts, and other resources for D1, D2, and NAIA schools that are contained in one convenient place — the book — for easy access.
  • A lot of the other online resources I stumbled across had pretty hefty price tags or recurring monthly payments. Play College Football seemed like a relative bargain at only $39.95, considering the monetary value of college football scholarships and the priceless value of a high school player achieving his dream of becoming a scholarship college football player.

And for the record, other than the personal satisfaction of knowing I referred someone to a resource that can impact their life in a profoundly positive way, I don’t personally benefit in the least if you click over and buy Play College Football.

But I know one thing: you will benefit…greatly.

The story of Clay Matthews is certainly compelling, and will become even more compelling around these parts if he somehow falls to the Browns in the 2nd round (where I can’t imagine them not taking him). My hope in writing this post is to not just provide value to Browns fans and football fans in general with an inspiring story, but more importantly to help other high school football players out there become the next Clay Matthews.

We’ve been accused of rumor-mongering on this blog, and you all know we dabble in gratuitous and irreverent humor from time to time, so consider this my way of putting a deposit in the karma bank and paying it forward, so to speak. For any of our loyal readers and casual visitors who are high school football players dreaming of a college football scholarship, or who are parents of a high school football player dreaming of college football scholarships, or even if you just know a kid who has Clay Matthews-type dreams, I’d suggest you check out Play College Football.

college football scholarships: how to get recruitedThe one thing that struck me about Tom Faulkner was how genuine he seemed about wanting to help families and other players like his son learn how to get recruited and ultimately obtain a college football scholarship. And after checking out the book for myself, it certainly delivers on its prodigious promises.

If you have any questions about the book, feel free to leave a comment below and I’ll respond as best I can, or direct it to the attention of Mr. Faulkner. And for those of you who end up buying and using the book, please stop back by and leave a comment with your story.

As a kid who once had dreams of getting recruited and playing college sports myself, which unfortunately never really materialized, it is always fun to live vicariously through those whose dreams do end up coming true.

Follow the link to visit the official website for Play College Football

Clay Matthews photo credit: Jeff Gross/Getty Images



Cowboys Cut Terrell Owens – Where Might T.O. End Up?

Email Post Email Post
Terrell Owens Crying

Terrell Owens Cut by Dallas CowboysLate last night my dad called to tell me that Terrell Owens had been cut by the Dallas Cowboys. Normally, this would not appear to have tremendous relevance for a Midwest sports blog. However, I live in Dallas and have to listen to T.O. B.S. seemingly every single day — and of course today was no exception. Thus, let me just write this post and purge myself of any lingering T.O. thoughts so I can get on with the rest of my day.

First off, I agree with the move from the Cowboys’ perspective. Yes, it creates a big question mark at WR, where they now only have the overrated Roy Williams and the underwhelming trio of Patrick Crayton, Miles Austin, and Sam Hurd. However, this is a very good draft for WRs, and with their first round the pick the Cowboys should be able to target guys like Jeremy Maclin or Percy Harvin.

What’s that you say? The Cowboys traded their first round pick in 2009 for Roy Williams? Oh. Hmm…

Well, surely they can still make a play for a WR in free agency, right? Let’s take a look at the Scout.com list of still-available free agent WRs, now that TJ Houshmandzadeh has signed with the Seahwaks and Laveraneus Coles has signed with Bengals. Here is a quick list of the top guys left:

  • Marvin Harrison
  • Jerry Porter
  • Lance Moore
  • Joey Galloway
  • D.J. Hackett
  • Drew Bennett
  • And a bunch of other guys not really worth mentioning who fit into the Miles Austin-Sam Hurd class of nondescript 4th or 5th WRs.

So…not a whole lot there to choose from. I could see Marvin Harrison as a potential option, a stop-gap for this season. But he is living more on reputation than anything else these days, and his rep isn’t even that good anymore. Jerry Jones does like to bring in “names” though, so I wouldn’t necessarily count Harrison out.

The point of this silly exercise is that the Cowboys made themselves a less talented offense by cutting Terrell Owens, and there are not a whole lot of options out there to replace him. But you know what? I still think it will make them a better team. Here’s why:

  • The Cowboys should be built around the run, not the pass. They have Marion Barber, Felix Jones, and Tashard Choice in the backfield. Three excellent runners. Plus, they have a big and meaty offensive line that is adequate enough as a run blocking unit. Now that T.O. doesn’t need to be coddled and thrown to, the Cowboys can focus more on the ground.
  • If it comes down to a pissing contest between your franchise QB and your aging, no-as-effective-anymore WR, you have to side with the QB. I think Tony Romo displayed some immaturity last year, and the jury is out as to whether he can win in the playoffs, but I’d rather him be happy than placate Owens if I’m a Cowboys fan.
  • Roy Williams does have talent, and the Cowboys dealt a #1 pick for him last year. This allows Williams to step into the #1 role and prove what he can do. It will allow to Cowboys to find out if they have a true #1 receiver to build the offense around, or if they need to move onto plan C next offseason.
  • And finally, and more importantly, releasing T.O. will undoubtedly help with locker room harmony and chemistry. Perhaps the Cowboys are getting smarter and Jerry Jones is figuring out what wins football games these days. Putting a bunch of big names on a roster doesn’t do it — creating a team does. T.O. may sometimes get blamed for things that are not his fault, but he has earned that absence of any benefit of the doubt. He’s had problems with every QB he’s ever played with and history has proven that he just can’t stay in one place too long. His welcome had been worn out in Dallas, and it was time for him to go. The Cowboys will be better off because of it.

Another hot topic of conversation on both 1310 The Ticket and Mike & Mike in the Morning as I drove in today was where Terrell Owens might end up now that he is not the teacher’s pet for Jerry Jones any longer. Let’s take a quick trip through the divisions and see what teams could potentially be a fit, keeping these components in mind:

  • The team has to have some cap space
  • There needs to be an established QB who would command T.O.’s respect and keep him in line
  • There needs to be a need at the WR position

.And just for fun, I’ll rate my own thoughts of the likelihood of T.O. ending up somewhere on a 1-10 scale.

(FYI: All cap numbers were taken from WalterFootball.com’s team-by-team offseason reports and may not reflect the most up-to-date numbers. Great site though.)

You can also feel free to skip my a.m. ramblings from this morning and hop on over to PFT’s Anti-TO List. Expectedly, some of my projections below have already proven erroneous.

NFC East:

  • New York Giants: They obviously need a WR, and have $11 million in cap space. Considering Tom Coughlin’s history with Bill Parcells though, and the headaches caused by Plaxico Burress last year, there are hurdles. But the Giants have a strong locker room and a laid-back QB in Eli Manning would could get along with T.O. for a year or two. This is a very hard one to handicap. 6 out of 10.
  • Washington Redskins: They are up against the cap after the Albert Haynesworth signing and just recently drafted young WRs to go along with Santana Moss and Antwaan Randle El. There is absolutely no reason for the Redskins to look at T.O. In fact, it would be a dumb, stupid, ludicrous move for them to make — which is exactly why it is slightly possible, given Daniel Snyder’s history. 1 out of 10
  • Philadelphia Eagles: The position need is there, but no way, no how. Been there, done that. 0 out of 10

NFC North:

  • Chicago Bears: This is an interesting one. The Bears don’t have much at receiver beyond Devin Hester and do have some cap space. With the team committing to Kyle Orton, adding another weapon could certainly help him out. I think the fit seems possible, but I just don’t see it. 3 out of 10
  • Detroit Lions: No way. They were 0-16 last year and need to rebuild, and Jim Schwartz won’t want anything to do with T.O., especially they go QB with the #1 pick. 0 out of 10.
  • Green Bay Packers: WR is already a strength for this team. No chance. 0 out of 10.
  • Minnesota Vikings: They have cap space, and a few decent-to-good WRs in Bernard Berrian and Bobby Wade. They just signed a new QB in Sage Rosenfels, but are obviously built to win games on the ground. And Brad Childress was in Philly with T.O. 0 out of 10.

NFC South:

  • Atlanta Falcons: Young QB in Matt Ryan and an established #1 WR in Roddy White. No chance. 0 out of 10.
  • Carolina Panthers: They need a WR to step in for Muhsin Muhammad, but they want to go young. They wouldn’t replace Muhammad with T.O., since the two are essentially the same game nowadays, but Muhammad doesn’t have the baggage. 0 out of 10.
  • New Orleans Saints: They are not in a great cap situation, so probably could not sign T.O. and still sign their rookie FAs. They do love to pass the ball and Terrell Owens would give Drew Brees another solid target, plus T.O. might respect Brees enough to treat him decently for a year or so. I guess it is possible, but highly unliekly. 1 out of 10.
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers: They certainly have the cap space, but just resigned Antonio Bryant and Michael Clayton. Plus, they will have a great chance to get a WR in the first round of the draft. But with Kellen Winslow and Jerramy Stevens already on the team, could they afford another head case? 1 out of 10.

NFC West:

  • Arizona Cardinals: If they don’t get Anquan Boldin extended and happy, there would be a void at the WR position. However, they would have Steve Breaston to step right in. Plus, the Cardinals are cheap, and I doubt Kurt Warner wants to deal with T.O.’s whining. 1 out of 10.
  • San Francisco 49ers: I cannot imagine Mike Singletary wanting to bring T.O. back to where it all started. There are still question marks for this team at QB, and Singletary showed last year how much patience he has for me-first guys: zero. There is a need at WR, but enough to go for Terrell Owens. 0 out of 10.
  • Seattle Seahawks: Maybe, had they not just signed T.J. Houshmandzadeh. No reason to reach for T.O. anymore, especially with the chance to take Michael Crabtree in the draft. They do have a strong QB in Hasselbeck and could still use more WR help, but I don’t really see it. 1 out of 10.
  • St. Louis Rams: The need is definitely there, especially with Torry Holt asking to be released. They Rams have an established QB in Marc Bulger who could potentially get along with Terrell Owens. And new head coach Steve Spagnuolo has faced T.O. times a year and will have a good idea if Owens is washed up, or if he has anything left to give. The Rams do have some cap space. This is a possibility. 6 out of 10.

AFC East:

  • Buffalo Bills: The Bills have a lot of cap space, but have Lee Evans, Josh Reed, and James Hardy at WR, with plenty of other holes to fill. 0 out of 10.
  • Miami Dolphins: Riiight. Bill Parcells and “The Player” back together again? I think not. -6983 out of 10.
  • New England: They already have Randy Moss and Wes Welker and will want to bring young guys in to fill their other WR voids. The locker room and QB situation would work, and the Pats have cap space, but I don’t think T.O.’s production justifies the headache anymore. 1 out of 10.
  • New York Jets: The need is there, with Laveraneus Coles headed to the Bengals. They are up against the cap though, and still have rookies to sign. Plus, with no established QB, what would keep T.O. in line? 2 out of 10.

AFC North:

  • Baltimore Ravens: They need a WR, especially with Derrick Mason getting older, but they will want that WR to be younger. They do have cap space as well. Perhaps the Ravens feel like T.O. could put them over the age and give them a chance to go one step further than last year. Joe Flacco is a young QB, but Ray Lewis and the strong personalities on D could help keep Owens in line. This one is intriguing, but still unlikely I think. 5 out of 10.
  • Cincinnati Bengals: They just signed Coles, so the need is not there. They have cap space, but why waste it on Owens? 0 out of 10.
  • Cleveland Browns: Especially if they end up trading Braylon Edwards, WR will be a need. And the Browns do have cap space. However, I don’t see T.O. meshing well at with Eric Mangini. 0 out 10.
  • Pittsburgh Steelers: No way. They have Holmes and Ward, and I can’t see Mike Tomlin putting up with Owens. 0 out of 10.

AFC South:

  • Houston Texans: The cap space is there, and Matt Schaub is an established veteran. However, Andre Johnson is the clear #1, and Kevin Walter had a solid year that year. They could use another WR, and I guess this is possible, but I still can’t really see it happening. 2 out of 10.
  • Indianapolis Colts: This one is very intriguing to me. The Colts need 3 WRs for their offense to functional as usual. With Marvin Harrison gone, they need someone to line up opposite Reggie Wayne so Anthony Gonzalez can work the slot. Peyton Manning would obviously demand T.O. respect; but, there is a first time head coach that may not be ready to deal with T.O. And cap space is an issue. I think there are reasons why this could work on the field in the short term, but it is probably not possible. 1 out of 10.
  • Jacksonville Jaguars: They basically have nothing at WR. They do, however, have an established QB in David Garrard and enough cap space to make a deal happen. However, with the disharmony that was present in the locker room last year, why would you bring in Terrell Owens? This is only possible because of the immense strength of the need Jacksonville has at WR, but I’d be shocked if they were dumb enough to bring a toxic element into an already toxic locker room. 4 out of 10.
  • Tennessee Titans: The Titans always need WRs. They signed Nate Washington and re-signed Justin McCareins, but T.O. would be top threat on the this team. They have $31 million in cap space as of February 8th, and a veteran QB in Kerry Collins who can get the ball down the field. Plus, Jeff Fisher seems like one of the coaches who has enough experience and skins on the wall to keep T.O. in line temporarily. There are a lot of reasons why this is possible, though still not probably. 5 out of 10.

AFC West:

  • Denver Broncos: They already have Brandon Marshall and Eddie Royal, and I don’t think a young first-time head coach is equipped to deal with Jay Cutler’s bitchiness, Marshall’s immaturity, and T.O.’s ego. 0 out of 10.
  • Kansas City Chiefs: On the field, Terrell Owens would be a nice #2 option after Dwayne Bowe. But the Chiefs have a new QB situation and new coaches and management. The cap space is definitely there, but Scott Pioli will want to create a winning climate immediately, and T.O.’s selfishness won’t fit into that. 1 out of 10.
  • Oakland Raiders: Need is huge, and this is the Raiders. The cap situation is not good, buTerrell Owens cut by Dallas Cowboyst still — this is the Raiders. Never underestimate Al Davis’ willingness to do things that make no sense. 6 out of 10.
  • San Diego Chargers: Decent cap situation, established QB, so it could work from that perspective in the short term. However, the Chargers have needs needs beyond WR, where they have Vincent Jackson, Chris Chambers, and a core of young guys. Cant see this one. 1 out of 10.

So there you have it. According to my completely unscientific and hastily slapped together analysis, the most likely possible destinations for Terrell Owens are the Raiders, the Giants, and the Rams, with the Ravens, Titans, and Jaguars as secondary possibilities.

I think any of these teams would be making a big mistake, but this is the NFL. Someone will roll the dice on T.O. if the price is right, but I think they’ll be sorry in the end — just like the Cowboys were.



What Players Can Move up the Top 50 of the MLB Career Homeruns List in 2009?

Email Post Email Post
junior

MLB Career Homeruns List - Top 500 | 500 Homerun HittersWith another baseball season quickly approaching, let’s take a look at what active players have an opportunity to move into prominent positions on the All-Time Career Home Run List. The top 50 career homerun hitters heading into the 2009 season are listed in the table below.

The following players have legitimate shots to move into the top 50 with “normal” seasons. The top 50 cut-off point is currently the 390 career homeruns hit by Graig Nettles.

  • Jim Edmonds is at #55 with 382 career homeruns. He needs 9 more homeruns to crack the top 50. Probability: High
  • Andruw Jones is at #66 with 371 career homeruns. He needs 20 more homeruns to crack the top 50. Probability: Who the hell knows
  • Luis Gonzalez is at #74 with 354 career homeruns. He needs 37 more homeruns to crack the top 50. Probablity: Next to impossible, unless he gets back on the juice
  • Albert Pujols is at #98 with 319 career homeruns. He needs 72 more homeruns to crack the top 50. Probablity: Low, but let’s all hope and pray he goes two over that total and becomes the legitimate single-season homerun king.

Now, how about the current players in the Top 20 of the career homeruns list, and where they could end the 2009 season:MLB Career Homeruns List - Top 50 | 500 Homerun Hitters

  • Ken Griffey Jr. sits at #5 on the career home runs list with 611. He needs 49 to tie Willie Mays for #4. I’d love to see it happen, but probably not this season. Maybe if he plays two more.
  • Alex Rodriguez sits at #12 on the career home runs list. With 58 homeruns in 2009, he would tie Ken Griffey Jr. for 5th. More likely is that he hits somewhere between 33 and 55 and ends the 2009 season ahead of Frank Robinson for 7th on the career homeruns list.
  • Jim Thome sits at #14 on the career home runs list. If he hits 32 or more homeruns in 2009, he will pass Harmon Killebrew, currently at #9.
  • Manny Ramirez sits at #17 on the career homer uns list with 527. Harmon Killebrew’s 573 might not be out of the question in Manny plays an entire season like he ended last season with the Dodgers. More than likely, Manny Ramirez will somewhere near or above 36 homeruns in 2009 and challenge Reggie Jackson, who is currently #11 with 563.
  • Frank Thomas is currently tied for 18th with 521 career homeruns. The A’s recently declined arbitration with The Big Hurt, and his 2009 season is up in the air, despite his stated desire to play two more years. Mickey Mantle at #15 with 536 homeruns is within reach is Frank is healthy and gets regular at bats.

To figure out where the rest of the Top 50 career homerun hitters could end up after the 2009 season, just use the chart below to see where they currently rank:


Get MLB Tickets at StubHub!

MLB Top 50 Career Homeruns List

Number Player Career Homeruns
1 Barry Bonds^ 762
2 Hank Aaron 755
3 Babe Ruth 714
4 Willie Mays 660
5 Ken Griffey Jr.* 611
6 Sammy Sosa^ 609
7 Frank Robinson 586
8 Mark McGwire^ 583
9 Harmon Killebrew 573
10 Rafael Palmeiro^ 569
11 Reggie Jackson 563
12 Alex Rodriguez^* 553
13 Mike Schmidt 548
14 Jim Thome* 541
15 Mickey Mantle 536
16 Jimmie Foxx 534
17 Manny Ramirez* 527
18-T Willie McCovey 521
18-T Frank Thomas* 521
18-T Ted Williams 521
21 Ernie Banks 512
21-T Eddie Mathews 512
23 Mel Ott 511
24 Eddie Murray 504
25 Gary Sheffield^* 499
26-T Lou Gehrig 493
26-T Fred McGriff 493
28-T Stan Musial 475
28-T Willie Stargell 475
30 Carlos Delgado* 469
31 Dave Winfield 465
32 Jose Canseco^ 462
33 Carl Yastrzemski 452
34 Jeff Bagwell^ 449
35 Dave Kingman 442
36 Andre Dawson 438
37 Juan Gonzalez^ 434
38 Cal Ripken Jr. 431
39 Mike Piazza 427
40 Billy Williams 426
41 Darrell Evans 414
42 Chipper Jones* 408
43 Duke Snider 407
44-T Andres Galarraga 39
44-T Al Kaline 399
46 Dale Murphy 398
47-T Joe Carter 396
47-T Jason Giambi^* 396
49 Vladimir Guerrero 392
50 Graig Nettles 390
     
  * - active player  
  ^ - linked to steroid use  

Click here to see the rest of the top 500 career homeruns list.

And now, I don’t feel out iota of guilt for putting ^ marks next to players’ names who have been implicated, explicit proof or not, for using steroids. Major League Baseball lost its chance to provide players the benefit of the doubt, in my opinion. As far as I’m concerned, you are guilty until proven innocent when credible allegations arise.

What a bunch of cheating liars…



Spring Training Notes 5.4.09 | Minnesota Twins

Email Post Email Post

Quick spring training update this morning. The Minnesota Twins beat an entire country yesterday as Puerto Rico was no match for the trio of Joe Crede, Jason Kubel, and Kevin Slowey as the Twins took the 3-2 win. Joe Crede had his first hit as a member of the Minnesota Twins with a 2 RBI double, while Jason Kubel continued his hot streak going 3-3. Kevin Slowey also turned in another great performance staying perfect through 3 innings.

This afternoon the Twins will throw Francisco Liriano at the Pirates.  You can catch the live audio from the game on MLB.com.  Lineups for today:

TWINS
SP Francisco Liriano (LHP)
1. Denard Span, RF
2. Alexi Casilla, 2B
3. Delmon Young, LF
4. Michael Cuddyer, DH
5. Brian Buscher, 1B
6. Wilson Ramos, C
7. Carlos Gomez, CF
8. Matt Tolbert, SS
9. Matt Macri, 3B

RP: R.A. Dickey, Matt Guerrier, Craig Breslow, Jose Mijares, Bobby Keppel and Rob Delaney.

PIRATES
SP Tom Gorzelanny (LHP)
1. Nyjer Morgan, LF
2. Freddy Sanchez, 2B
3. Nate McLouth, CF
4. Ryan Doumit, C
5. Adam LaRoche, 1B
6. Craig Monroe, RF
7. Brandon Moss, DH
8. Andy LaRoche, 3B
9. Jack Wilson, SS

…..

Links from around Twins Nation

Nick and Nick discussing if the Royals are for real.

Twinkie Town’s observations from Spring Training



What the F–k was that? It was Matt Vasgersian Dropping an F-Bomb Live on the MLB Network

Email Post Email Post

Matt Vasgersian Drops F-BombI love the MLB Network. It has only been on TV since the beginning of the year, but it is already a nightly destination for me. The features (like 30 Clubs in 30 Days), nightly studio show, and classic game replays are all perfect fixes for the baseball junkie in me.

And now, the MLB Network has officially arrived with its first live dropping of an f-bomb.

The official arrival of the MLB Network came courtesy of studio host Matt Vasgersian and was captured and subsequently placed on YouTube (which I found via BallHype).

This, ladies and gentleman, is what YouTube was made for. Here is the video of Matt Vasgersian dropping the f-bomb, and obviously it is not suitable for work unless the volume is really, really low:

Way to go Matt! My money for the first f-bomb would have been placed on Mitch Williams, but maybe he is biding his time before becoming the first MLB Network talking head to laugh like a hyena uncontrollably.



Jay Cutler-to-Browns Trade Rumor a Lie Ironically Started by Someone Named “The Truth”

Email Post Email Post

Jay Cutler to Browns Trade Rumors a LieYesterday, the big story in Cleveland was the possibility of a Jay Cutler for Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers trade. I do not know this first-hand, but that is what people in Cleveland tell me. As many of you know, the genesis of this rumor was a website called BroncosFreaks.com, which originally “reported” that unnamed sources said such a deal could be in the works.

It turns out, the original source for the rumor was a complete a fabrication; and ironically, it was started by someone that calls himself (at least on one message board) “The Truth.”

If you want some background on the Cutler rumor, here you go:

And then all hell breaks loose from there. And I know this a) several of my Cleveland friends called to ask me about the rumor, and b) because the original post about the Jay Cutler trade rumors drew tons of traffic yesterday from Google searches, meaning people were hearing about this and looking for info. Traffic surges like the one experienced by that post yesterday usually happen when a radio or TV show mention something and then people hop on line to research.

Then later in the day yesterday, the rumor made its way to the Plain-Dealer, Yahoo Sports, apparently Colin Cowherd mentioned it, as did others, etc., etc.

And then late last night, I see traffic coming in from this site right here.

As usual, I follow the link because I am always interested in where our traffic comes from. If you go to that link, you see the person calling himself “The Truth” taking credit for starting the false Jay Cutler-to-the-Browns rumor, and then the ensuing back slapping from his lemmings in the forum.

I guess “The Truth” should be given some kind of backhanded credit for creating a lie that succeeded in getting a certain portion of the blogosphere and media worked up yesterday; but the actual truth is that all I have been able to find are people mentioning the existence of the rumor, and saying that it was highly unlikely.

Umm…that’s the truth.

  • A. There was a rumor that the Browns and Broncos were in trade talks…the rumor just happened to be based on false information.
  • B. The rumor had some big names in it, thus providing entertaining fodder for conversation on a slow weekday of sports news. That made discussion of it relevant, especially since no one that I can see reported the contents of the rumor as fact (although, please correct me if I am wrong on this) — just that there was a rumor out there.

So while I applaud “The Truth” for succeeding in his attempt to create a frenzy of activity about what was posted on BroncosFreaks.com, I think the primary thing that was accomplished is that no one will ever believe anything following the phrase “our sources” ever again on BroncosFreaks.com. So I hope your credibility was worth it.

The way I see it, we live in a 24-hour news cycle in which rumors come and go, but many times provide excellent prisms through which to view controversial or hot button topics. For instance, the Cutler rumor compelled Browns fans a chance to analyze their thoughts on:

  • Do you really believe Brady Quinn is the QB of the future in Cleveland?
  • Would you be behind a move to acquire Jay Cutler, who it has been reported for many days is on the trading block? (The Broncos came out and said yesterday that he is definitively not on the trading block anymore, however.)
  • What should be done with Shaun Rogers? Ship him out if his relationship with Mangini is too strained? Or do whatever is necessary to placate him because he irreplaceable?
  • And on and on…

Now that yesterday’s news cycle has passed, the Cutler-to-the-Browns rumor isn’t a story anymore. The only story today is that the rumor wasn’t actually a rumor to begin with. But for anyone who reported it for what it was — A RUMOR — I’m not sure it really warrants feeling bad about in any way, or thinking “The Truth” got the better of you. In both journalism and blogging you are only worth the extent of your credibility. Aanyone who reported the Jay Cutler-to-the-Browns story as a rumor, especially those who added conspicuous caveats that it was baseless other the line at BroncosFreaks.com, was simply reporting fact.

Take ProFootballTalk for instance. Their site is specifically geared towards being a repository for whatever NFL news and rumor is out there, and they have learned heard lessons in the past by reporting rumors as fact (e.g. the infamous Terry Bradshaw story). When they reported the Cutler story, they were very clear that it was a rumor and they were not saying it was true. Yet, somehow, “The Truth” and his band of sycophants have taken yesterday to be yet another example of why PFT is garbage.

Which is great, except for the fact that it completely misses the point.

PFT, and others, reported the truth yesterday: a rumor was, in fact, floating around. BroncosFreaks.com reported the lie: “We understand that the Browns have an attractive option in place…Our source tells us the players involved are: Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers for Jay Cutler and the Broncos 3rd round draft pick.”

I only feel stupid for thinking that what was posted on BroncosFreaks.com potentially had even 1% validity. I’ve learned my lesson. Not that it will affect their traffic or blogging future in any way, but I won’t be reading them anymore or placing one ounce of credence in their reports that come from “sources.”

Anyone who hopped onto this story reporting rumor as fact was obviously wrong — just as wrong as “The Truth” and BroncosFreaks.com. Anyone who hopped onto the rumor and reported it for what it was, and then allowed it to serve as the starting point for compelling dialogue, well, I have a hard time calling those people to the mat. Sure, I’m one of them, but at least I don’t parade myself around as “The Truth” when the exact opposite is clearly the reality.

Well done “The Truth.” I hope you enjoyed the virtual hive fives from all of your forum buddies. You were successful in proving the irony of your name and in making everyone think twice in the future when BroncosFreaks.com posts information from an unnnamed and unlinked source. Other than that, I have to say that I rather enjoyed the speculation and worthwhile debate that proved to be the byproduct of your lie.  These were good issues for Browns fans address in what is no doubt a pivotal offseason and upcoming 2009 campaign.

I’ll just know not to come to you, or BroncosFreaks.com, for anything other than lies and disinformation any longer.  Thanks for the head’s up.



Jay Cutler is Not a Brown, But Is He a Bitch? Denver Radio Host Scott Hastings, and Others, Think So

Email Post Email Post

Jay Cutler Called a Little Bitch by Scott HastingsClearly I have decided to turn Midwest Sports Fans into JayCutler Sports Fans for one 24-hour sports news cycle. I thought I was done with the topic after my last post, which discussed why the Jay Cutler for Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers trade rumors were highly unlikely to become reality, but then Deadspin has to go and post something that somehow seems to serve as the perfect cap on Jay Cutler Day here at MSF.

Earlier this afternoon, Deadspin posted a story (via With Leather) that cited an appearance on the Dan Patrick Show by former NBA player and current Denver-area radio personality Scott Hastings. And apparently Scott Hastings is not a real big fan of Jay Cutler, so much so that he went as far to say that Jay Cutler is a “little bitch.”

From the SI.com summary of the Scott Hastings appearance on The Dan Patrick Show:

Jay Cutler lost Hastings’ respect when he claimed his arm is stronger than John Elway‘s. This was just a stupid thing to say because Elway is a legend in Denver so saying something like that just angers the fanbase. He calls Cutler an “arrogant little punk” and should wake up to the reality that he’s the QB of an NFL football team and should act like a leader. He also referred to Cutler as a “little bitch.”

Now, obviously the next question is why is the opinion of Scott Hastings even relevant? And why is this story even relevant?

As for the first question, by itself Scott Hastings’ opinion is not that relevant. However, he does echo a similar sentiment about Jay Cutler made by Gene Wojciechowski on ESPN.com yesterday:

Don’t get me wrong — Cutler is a talent, possibly a major talent. His numbers keep tracking upward (4,526 passing yards, 25 touchdowns in ’08), but so do his turnovers (18 interceptions, including four in Denver’s last three games — all losses) and hissy fits.

And there have been other incidents that call Cutler’s alleged bitchiness and gigantic ego into question, like his strange boast about having a stronger arm than notoriously strong-armed Bronco legend John Elway. Seeing as how Elway is beloved in Denver and a two-time Super Bowl champion, it does seem to suggest a certain level of bitchiness and/or douchebaggery to place yourself not just on the same pedestal, but above, a living legend in whose gigantic footsteps you are ostensibly trying to follow.

And just ask Philip Rivers and the San Diego Chargers what they think of Jay Cutler. (And vice versa.)

As to the second question mentioned above — why is this story relevant? — Cutler’s name has come up in trade rumors with seemingly every team in the NFL over the past few days, most notably (for our audience anyway) with the Cleveland Browns. And I went on record as saying that even though the cap realities made a Cutler for Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers trade extremely unlikely, that getting Cutler would be a huge coup for the Browns.

Talent and production-wise, this is certainly true. Jay Cutler has proven that he can rack up passing yards, win a decent amount of games, and move the chains. Had Denver’s defense been better over the last few years, he might have made and won a playoff game or two. However, with each new story that comes out about Jay Cutler, his public persona takes hit after hit. (And, truth be told, perhaps The Legend of Jay Cutler grew a bit too much after his torrid start to last season. Otherwise, he has been a pretty pedestrian QB despite obvious physical gifts.)

Cutler whined recently about being involved in trade talks, despite the fact that Peter King reported on Monday that Cutler had actually requested a trade once Mike Shanahan and offensive coordinator Jeremy Bates were no longer in Denver. So what is it Jay? Did you really want to be traded? Or are you just a drama queen who enjoys stirring the pot and being the center of attention?

Either way, I can tell you this: such whining and histrionics would not play well in Cleveland, not one bit. Just ask Braylon Edwards. And it doesn’t look like it is necessarily playing well in Denver either.

So maybe it’s a good thing that the Jay Cutler for Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers trade rumors have turnedJay Cutler Called a Little Bitch out to be exactly just that: rumors; and moreover, rumors that appear to have no future legs because of the salary cap issues such a deal would present. Jay Cutler would give the Browns an immediate upgrade at the QB position in terms of arm strength and experience, but the organization and fans in Cleveland would also have to deal with his egomania and whining, which appears to be quite extensive and well documented.

And one more thing, before you ask why I’m even talking about this on Midwest Sports Fans: remember, Jay Cutler is from Santa Claus, Indiana. So it is well within our jurisdiction here. Unfortunately, Jay Cutler does not seem to have taken on many of the personality traits of his hometown’s namesake. On the contrary, the kid from the town named after Jolly ‘Ol St. Nick is quickly earning a reputation as Whiny ‘Ol Jay Bitch.

The more I think about it, the more I’m starting to come around to the opinion of Scott and many of the commenters over at Waiting For Next Year. We may not know what we have in Brady Quinn, but Jay Cutler may best be left as someone else’s problem.



World Baseball Classic Predictions: USA, Dominican Republic Challenging Japan

Email Post Email Post

2009 World Baseball Classic Odds and PredictionsThose who are playing this year’s World Baseball Classic odds are gearing up for the tournament’s first game on Thursday and offshore sportsbook odds are counting on a three-horse race for the title. There are also a couple of online betting underdogs looking to crash the party.

The United States are co-favorites at +200, and they have the best infield in the competition, led by Dustin Pedroia, Derek Jeter, Jimmie Rollins and David Wright. The starting pitching is in good shape with Roy Oswalt, Jake Peavy and Ted Lilly, but the absence of Joe Nathan and B.J. Ryan is a blow to their bullpen.

The Dominican Republic are also rated at +200 after losing to Cuba in the semifinal in 2006 and, in Alex Rodriguez and David Ortiz, they have a monster mid-lineup duo. The starting pitchers are very young, but talented, and they’ll be the key to the Dominican Republic’s World Baseball Classic betting chances.

Japan is listed at +400 to defend its title, and Daisuke Matsuzaka is looking to repeat his MVP performance from the 2006 tournament. Japan was very balanced en route to its victory, leading the competition in batting average and homers, and it was third in ERA.

Two WBC betting underdogs are Cuba at +800 and Venezuela at +1200. Cuba lost to Japan in the 2006 final and returns with an entire roster of non-MLB players. Venezuela would love to have Johan Santana on the roster, but now the onus is on Carlos Zambrano to lead the pitching staff.

This tournament will come down to the best teams, and those are the United States and Dominican Republic. The key player in this tournament will be A-Rod, who will be looking to put a tumultuous offseason behind him with a massive performance. When making your World Baseball Classic picks, bet on the Dominican Republic at the sportsbook.



LOTD: The Death the Cutler for Quinn-Rogers Trade Rumors — and the Mainstream Media

Email Post Email Post

Cap Implications of Cutler for Quinn-Rogers TradeAs you can tell, today has been a day of pure Browns speculation.

After reading last night about the rumored discussions between the the Browns and Broncos regarding a Jay Cutler for Brady Quinn-Shaun Rogers trade, I threw up a post detailing the speculation, with the caveat that the cap ramifications made a trade highly unlikely. Then, after reading PFT’s piece about the Giants stock-piling defensive lineman, I decided to throw the Braylon Edwards for Mathias Kiwanuka trade speculation out there too.

And things kind of took off from there.

Now though, it is time to throw a little water on the fire, at least with respect to the Jay Cutler for Brady Quinn and Shaun Rogers rumors. And the water comes courtesy of today’s official MSF superstar Barry McBride, who dug a little deeper into the cap ramifications for the Browns of such a trade. His post is today’s Link of the Day, in an effort to bring the Cutler trade rumors somewhat full circle since last night:

LOTD: It’s More Fun to Watch the Media Collapse in Real-Time! — (Orange and Brown Report)

I put some duct-tape around my brain and figured out the cap impact today. Dealing Quinn and Rogers, assuming no new contracts, would give the Browns more than eight million in additional dead cap space for 2009.

That assumes the Browns make the deal before any roster bonuses are paid to Quinn and Rogers this year. If not, then add those to the dead cap pile.

Then you have to pay Jay Cutler, which would be another million at the very least, if you don’t re-do his contract. BTW, he gets a $4 million roster bonus next year.

So, let’s figure you just burned $10 million – slightly less than half your cap space on a team with many holes – to swap Quinn and Rogers for Cutler. That’s a little less than 10% of your total cap space to make that swap. At least that leaves 90% for the other 50 guys.

Wow. Hey. Brilliant move.

You’ll have to hop on over to the OBR Rumor Central to read the rest of the article, but it is highly worth it. The above excerpt is presented as part of a discussion about the challenges currently being faced by the real media as they come to terms with the Wild Wild West nature of the Internet. As McBride says:

Seriously, why would an ad-supported news site even bother to spend time and money breaking news? They maybe get 10% of the page views for breaking the story. Info-scavengers get the rest. The information eco-system is upside down.

He raises some extraordinarily interesting points, especially coming from the perspective of a guy who is helping to run a website that puts a good portion of its content behind a pay wall. You can access Rumor Central for free, but you have to pay the OBR to access the really good stuff. (And as I’ve said before, I am a paying subscriber and it is highly worth it.) There have been plenty of times where I have something interesting at the OBR and wanted to post about it here, but instead have just linked to their main site and suggested that you too should become a subscriber.

It is quite possible that to survive, newspapers will have to begin structuring their websites the same way. Otherwise, the information poachers (and I am guilty as charged) can continue to drive traffic from commentary based off the “free” information provided by the hard-working journalists at these newspapers. The OBR seems to have a pretty good model, although I have no idea what their revenue or profit model looks like; and there is a good chance that we will see more and more websites who provide first-hand reporting (as they do at the OBR) go to a similar model.

I certainly can’t say I would blame them. It would just make the existence of run-of-the-mill bloggers like yours truly a little more difficult…and a lot more expensive. Don’t get me wrong, I am not writing this to decry bloggers or say that I think we are doing something inherently wrong by citing excerpts (so as long as links are provided). I work very hard at what I do and try to take the original source report and add my own spin, insights, commentary, or perspective. Even if I stopped, citing some grand altruistic intentions, what real difference would it make? We drive 2,500-5,000 visitors a day at Midwest Sports Fans, which is exciting to us, but hardly even a raindrop in the ocean of the sports blogosphere.

However, add those raindrops up from all the many sports blogs that primarily post second-hand commentary off of first-hand reporting, and you have part of the reason for the inclement storm currently rocking the mainstream media ships to the point of being capsized.

It’s a very interesting topic, and there is no doubt that the strategies newspapers employ to stay afloat could alter sports blogging, and blogging in general, in the months and years ahead. Post your thoughts down in the comments, but definitely check out the article at the OBR. It is very interesting food for thought.

Here is the link again:

LOTD: It’s More Fun to Watch the Media Collapse in Real-Time! — (Orange and Brown Report)

And more links from around the sports blogosphere:

Is Roberto Alomar telling us the truth? — (Deep Left Field)

The Week That Was College Basketball: March 3, 2009 — (Sparty and Friends)

Lou Piniella outraged by ESPN analyst’s criticism — (Chicago Tribune)

The Worst Contracts in Baseball — (Spring Training 09)

2009 NFL Mock Draft — (My Sports Rumors)

The Real Big Ben Vegas Picks — (Mondesi’s House)

Happy Birthday Ben Roethlisberger — (One For the Thumb)

The WBC and MLB’s Marketing Experiment (Revisited) — (The Biz of Baseball)

Jay Cutler photo courtesy of AP Photo/Ed Andrieski