<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Bowl Results: List of Super Bowl Winners and Losers By Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/</link>
	<description>A sports blog by and for Midwest Sports Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JerodMSF</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-48191</link>
		<dc:creator>JerodMSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-48191</guid>
		<description>You are correct! Thanks. Table updated. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct! Thanks. Table updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meng</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-48134</link>
		<dc:creator>Meng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-48134</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t your list of Super Bowl winners/losers be updated? It&#039;s a couple years behind. 2011 and 1012 shows no team(s). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#039;t your list of Super Bowl winners/losers be updated? It&#039;s a couple years behind. 2011 and 1012 shows no team(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COWBOYS09</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-26867</link>
		<dc:creator>COWBOYS09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-26867</guid>
		<description>PACKERS PACKERS PACKERS PACKER ; Green &amp; Yellow Baybeh &lt;33 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PACKERS PACKERS PACKERS PACKER ; Green &amp; Yellow Baybeh &lt;33</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Famijoly</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-16497</link>
		<dc:creator>Famijoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-16497</guid>
		<description>The Super Bowl came about because the American Football League began play in 1960 and offered fans another choice for major-league-level professional football in the United States.  In 1966, the AFL and the National Football League agreed on terms for a merger.  One of those was the NFL-AFL World Championship Game played after the rival leagues&#039; championship games.  Lamar Hunt, a founding owner of the AFL (Dallas Texans/Kansas City Chiefs), thought the name of a rubber ball with a highly charged center that his kids had, with the brand name Superball, would work, under the name Super Bowl, for the NFL-AFL World Championship Game.  The two leagues split the four meetings their championship teams had. The National Football League has continued to use the name Super Bowl for the NFL Championship Game since the merger was complete, beginning with the 1970 season.  When I think Super Bowl, I think of the AFL; if it weren&#039;t for the AFL, there would be no Super Bowl. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl came about because the American Football League began play in 1960 and offered fans another choice for major-league-level professional football in the United States.  In 1966, the AFL and the National Football League agreed on terms for a merger.  One of those was the NFL-AFL World Championship Game played after the rival leagues&#8217; championship games.  Lamar Hunt, a founding owner of the AFL (Dallas Texans/Kansas City Chiefs), thought the name of a rubber ball with a highly charged center that his kids had, with the brand name Superball, would work, under the name Super Bowl, for the NFL-AFL World Championship Game.  The two leagues split the four meetings their championship teams had. The National Football League has continued to use the name Super Bowl for the NFL Championship Game since the merger was complete, beginning with the 1970 season.  When I think Super Bowl, I think of the AFL; if it weren&#8217;t for the AFL, there would be no Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepsi Drops Super Bowl Campaign For "Cause-Related Marketing" &#124; LoveTomorrowToday</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-15419</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepsi Drops Super Bowl Campaign For "Cause-Related Marketing" &#124; LoveTomorrowToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-15419</guid>
		<description>[...] will have a different feel this year. No, we think the AFC will win again this year (the NFC has only won 3 times this decade). The big change, of course, will be that Pepsi is scrapping its entire Super Bowl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will have a different feel this year. No, we think the AFC will win again this year (the NFC has only won 3 times this decade). The big change, of course, will be that Pepsi is scrapping its entire Super Bowl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49ers4Life</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-13419</link>
		<dc:creator>49ers4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-13419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just happy that everytime my team went to the super bowl, they won! It doesn&#039;t matter to me that other teams have been there more than my 49ers have...it matters to me that everytime we did go, we walked away winners! Just wish those days were back again. Hopefully Singletary will bring some gold back to my 49ers!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m just happy that everytime my team went to the super bowl, they won! It doesn&#039;t matter to me that other teams have been there more than my 49ers have&#8230;it matters to me that everytime we did go, we walked away winners! Just wish those days were back again. Hopefully Singletary will bring some gold back to my 49ers!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JRod</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-4079</link>
		<dc:creator>JRod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-4079</guid>
		<description>@Miami Dol-Phan, you are absolutely correct.  Assuming you aren&#039;t seeing a cached page, the post should reflect the changes.  It&#039;s always great to have a Dolphins fan visiting the site; they were my first NFL love.  And I&#039;m hopeful that they&#039;ll keep taking steps forward next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miami Dol-Phan, you are absolutely correct.  Assuming you aren&#8217;t seeing a cached page, the post should reflect the changes.  It&#8217;s always great to have a Dolphins fan visiting the site; they were my first NFL love.  And I&#8217;m hopeful that they&#8217;ll keep taking steps forward next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami Dol-Phan</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-4078</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami Dol-Phan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-4078</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Cowboys (8) and Steelers (7) have combined for 15 appearances (not 17) and 11 wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Cowboys (8) and Steelers (7) have combined for 15 appearances (not 17) and 11 wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-4039</guid>
		<description>Its all valid ((im sure)) up until the end where its shows steeler and cardinals on the chart.... Why is steelers under the winner section and the game hasnt even been played yet!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its all valid ((im sure)) up until the end where its shows steeler and cardinals on the chart&#8230;. Why is steelers under the winner section and the game hasnt even been played yet!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Much Needed Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2009/01/super-bowl-results-list-of-super-bowl-winners-losers-by-year/#comment-3758</link>
		<dc:creator>Much Needed Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/?p=1343#comment-3758</guid>
		<description>&quot;If there is a Super Bowl that doesnâ€™t include Pittsburgh or Dallas, itâ€™s a suprise. Goodness. Counting this year, the two teams will have combined for 17 appearances and 11 titles (if Pittsburgh beats Arizona.)&quot;
-----------------------------

Yep, when you think Super Bowl, you think Pittsburgh.

Maybe they should change the name to the &quot;Steeler Bowl.&quot; Has a nice ring, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If there is a Super Bowl that doesnâ€™t include Pittsburgh or Dallas, itâ€™s a suprise. Goodness. Counting this year, the two teams will have combined for 17 appearances and 11 titles (if Pittsburgh beats Arizona.)&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Yep, when you think Super Bowl, you think Pittsburgh.</p>
<p>Maybe they should change the name to the &#8220;Steeler Bowl.&#8221; Has a nice ring, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 619/623 objects using apc

Served from: midwestsportsfans.com @ 2012-02-12 18:08:52 -->
